very negative
view of the game IMO. Playing 2 strikers+wes+lansbury and expecting the fullbacks to push on is very demanding against a decent team. Leeds did expose the weaknesses in the first 20 mins as to some extent did Reading.
Leeds had the time to put in quality crosses, which I don't think Ruddy could come for. AW won headers and held the ball up, closed players down and did ok. Whitbread was outstanding 1st and 2nd half.
Agree about Elland road though the West stand is enormous and that is without using the top tier.
Posted By: Firstnews on February 21st 2011 at 08:58:59
Message Thread
- my take on the leeds match...... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 21, 08:12:32
- Chelts good to see you in the (NCFC) - Badger, Feb 21, 10:23:05
- fair do's! (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 21, 10:33:14
- very negative (NCFC) - Firstnews, Feb 21, 08:58:59
- at the end of the day we are just shit that all seems pretty obvious. (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, Feb 21, 09:05:02
- sorry, I forgot. (n/m) (NCFC) - Firstnews, Feb 21, 09:07:08
- i just said.. (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 21, 09:55:49
- sorry, I forgot. (n/m) (NCFC) - Firstnews, Feb 21, 09:07:08
- at the end of the day we are just shit that all seems pretty obvious. (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, Feb 21, 09:05:02
- whitbread got good reviews from leeds fans (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 21, 08:23:19
- maybe second half...... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 21, 08:35:16
- others were saying he was decent (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 21, 08:36:43
- sorry........ (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 21, 08:40:08
- others were saying he was decent (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 21, 08:36:43
- maybe second half...... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 21, 08:35:16
- Chelts good to see you in the (NCFC) - Badger, Feb 21, 10:23:05
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.