they obviously have...

the same totally one-eyed approach to judging football matches that you do. Spookily not one single neutral report seems to agree with your biased s**te - they all seem to agree more (though to a lesser extent) with the Binners. Still, who cares. Results are everything. Are you really that desperate to have the Binners you loathe so much heap praise on us that you need them to say how great we were even though by all reasonable accounts we weren't?

Posted By: mr carra on September 19th 2005 at 10:28:46

Message Thread

It's funny, isn't it. (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Sep 19, 10:18:12
- I think it was fair to say that I was biting my finger nails down... (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Sep 19, 10:44:37
  - Not according to what Mr Carra read. (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Sep 19, 10:49:49
  - Point of Order: Clause 53... (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Sep 19, 10:47:39
    - and shouldn't be at football matches (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Sep 19, 10:49:45
    - he'd had a false set put on before the match.. (NCFC) - camcan, Sep 19, 10:49:40
    - As do legal documents. (n/m) (NCFC) - BeverlyHills0201, Sep 19, 10:48:52
- they obviously have... (NCFC) - mr carra, Sep 19, 10:28:46
  - You were there then? (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Sep 19, 10:40:13
    - I'm not denying that we had the better of the game... (NCFC) - mr carra, Sep 19, 10:52:57

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.