Our best 11 assuming Surman is fit...........
Its actually very tough but in a good way......
The lack of scoring from Martin and Jackson and AW is a bit worrying but at the same time I think they have enough quality to start firing again.
If all three sudenely hit form it might mean an incredible run of results as long as we can stop shipping goals.
Is their merit in having more creative players at the expense of a striker?
Could we play either Holt up front on his own with players like Lansbury and Wes just behind.
Or maybe Holt and Lansbury in the C Martin role?
What is interesting is the formation if we would have signed Elliot Bennet?
One of the many "best 11s"
------------------------Ruddy--------------------------
R Martin----------Ward--------Barnett---------Drury
Lansbury----------Crofts----------Fox------------Surman
----------------Holt-----------------C Martin-------------
or
------------------------Ruddy--------------------------
R Martin----------Ward--------Barnett---------Drury
----------------------------Fox--------------------------
Crofts--------------------------------------------Surman
-----------------Hoolahan or Lansbury?-----------------
----------------Holt-----------------C Martin-------------
Posted By: usacanary on February 2nd 2011 at 17:28:34
Message Thread
- Our best 11 assuming Surman is fit........... (NCFC) - usacanary, Feb 2, 17:28:34
- Mine (NCFC) - wgf500, Feb 2, 18:45:50
- Wes should be amc for footballer manager users :) (n/m) (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 2, 19:12:18
- on your second one - can we have crofts at the base and smith on the right please? (NCFC) - jampersands, Feb 2, 17:46:22
- for me (NCFC) - Brandonio, Feb 2, 17:33:00
- Mine (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Feb 2, 18:59:52
- is that where arsenal played lansbury then? (n/m) (NCFC) - jampersands, Feb 2, 17:33:43
- he doesn't play much for Arsenal (NCFC) - Brandonio, Feb 2, 17:49:51
- well i know that. nothing like being patronised (NCFC) - jampersands, Feb 2, 18:03:18
- I'd have him in more advanced role with Korey and Crofts covering (NCFC) - Brandonio, Feb 2, 18:05:40
- fair enough. i like your team (NCFC) - jampersands, Feb 2, 18:12:42
- left SCM out with a heavy heart (NCFC) - Brandonio, Feb 2, 18:16:50
- fair enough. i like your team (NCFC) - jampersands, Feb 2, 18:12:42
- I'd have him in more advanced role with Korey and Crofts covering (NCFC) - Brandonio, Feb 2, 18:05:40
- just knocked this up quickly, it's a team I would like to see us give a go (NCFC) - Brandonio, Feb 2, 17:56:29
- oic. didnt realise you were thinking of a diamond type thing (n/m) (NCFC) - jampersands, Feb 2, 18:04:39
- fair enough, should have explained better in the first place, my bad (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Feb 2, 18:06:10
- oic. didnt realise you were thinking of a diamond type thing (n/m) (NCFC) - jampersands, Feb 2, 18:04:39
- well i know that. nothing like being patronised (NCFC) - jampersands, Feb 2, 18:03:18
- he doesn't play much for Arsenal (NCFC) - Brandonio, Feb 2, 17:49:51
- Mine (NCFC) - wgf500, Feb 2, 18:45:50
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.