Sometimes "big name" players are not the answer

We had a period of doing the same thing, signing "name" players for quite a few quid.

We have a quality "team", no stars no egos, most of who have played lower leagues for most of their careers.

A collective bunch pulling in the same direction is always better than a group of individuals

Posted By: DiscoDaleGordon on February 1st 2011 at 08:54:22

Message Thread

rivals (Other Football) - jampersands, Feb 1, 08:11:10
- QPR already signed some excellent signings. likewise leicester and forest. (n/m) (Other Football) - Tony Martin, Feb 1, 08:18:02
  - Yup, no sense worrying about it though. Lambert won't spend for the sake of it (Other Football) - megson, Feb 1, 08:27:23
    - i think we did have something like that, for bennett (Other Football) - jampersands, Feb 1, 08:28:37
      - Yeah that's how i'm reading it, that's where we could go to, Brighton took a gamble on (Other Football) - megson, Feb 1, 08:32:13
  - qpr got shittu, ishmael miller, chimbonda, routledge. yeah, see what you mean (Other Football) - jampersands, Feb 1, 08:25:38
    - Sometimes "big name" players are not the answer (Other Football) - DiscoDaleGordon, Feb 1, 08:54:22
      - ^^^^^^This. (n/m) (Other Football) - megson, Feb 1, 09:30:11
- not so many in fact, earlier in the window leeds got george mccartney, (Other Football) - jampersands, Feb 1, 08:13:02

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.