Oh woops
Lambert has been charged under FA Rule E3 according to the FA site User Posted Link
Which seems to be this one, and if so that suggests that he's been charged for saying naughties to the ref, or criticising him afterwards, and not for leaving the technical area:
General Behaviour
3 (1) A Participant shall at all times act in the best interests of the game and shall not
act in any manner which is improper or brings the game into disrepute or use any
one, or a combination of, violent conduct, serious foul play, threatening, abusive,
indecent or insulting words or behaviour.
(2) In the event of any breach of Rule E 3(1) including a reference to any one or more
of a person?s ethnic origin, colour, race, nationality, faith, gender, sexual orientation
or disability (an ?aggravating factor?), a Regulatory Commission shall consider
the imposition of an increased sanction, taking into account the following entry
points:
For a first offence, a sanction that is double that which the Regulatory Commission
would have applied had the aggravating factor not been present.
For a second offence, a sanction that is treble that which the Regulatory
Commission would have applied had the aggravating factor not been present.
Any further such offence(s) shall give rise to consideration of a permanent
suspension.
These entry points are intended to guide the Regulatory Commission and are not
mandatory.
The Regulatory Commission shall have the discretion to impose a sanction greater
or less than the entry point, according to the aggravating or mitigating factors
present in each case.
Posted By: Old Git on November 16th 2010 at 17:28:54
Message Thread
- Fuck me, did they overturn it? Blimey. Genuine suprise to me that. (NCFC) - megson, Nov 16, 16:36:47
- Pretty chuffed with it in all. I suppose you've got to accept the charge on Lambert though (NCFC) - pants, Nov 16, 16:40:07
- Do we know what the charge is for? Pink Un just says "improper conduct" (NCFC) - Old Git, Nov 16, 17:07:00
- There was the odd silly remark like that kindergarten thing (NCFC) - pants, Nov 16, 17:11:33
- for being sent off surely (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 16, 17:07:35
- i dont....... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Nov 16, 16:43:54
- blair didn't lie (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 16, 16:45:51
- Do we know what the charge is for? Pink Un just says "improper conduct" (NCFC) - Old Git, Nov 16, 17:07:00
- indeed justice done (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 16, 16:39:01
- Pretty chuffed with it in all. I suppose you've got to accept the charge on Lambert though (NCFC) - pants, Nov 16, 16:40:07
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.