as in, he was there because of two disgraceful decisions, one of which has been recinded..
we should lodge an appeal against the tackle on our player to get readings offending player red carded and oliver banned from reffering, whilst we also get lambert off.
justice.
Posted By: Cheltenham_Canary on November 16th 2010 at 15:11:47
Message Thread
- so will Lamberts "sending off" be recinded too? seeing as it was on the basis of holts red (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Nov 16, 14:53:46
- Nope, he's been charged, Official SMS etc (n/m) (NCFC) - Al NCFC4life, Nov 16, 15:00:04
- No, he was out of the technical area bawling at the ref. Not got a leg to stand on. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 16, 14:57:30
- only circumstantial facts - surely worth an appeal? (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Nov 16, 14:59:18
- Also, "circumstantial facts" ?! (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 16, 15:00:59
- as in, he was there because of two disgraceful decisions, one of which has been recinded.. (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Nov 16, 15:11:47
- In fact: OFFICIAL SMS: Lambert charged with improper conduct. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 16, 15:00:17
- Quite right ott, let himself down IMO. Should of stayed calm and collected like I did. (NCFC) - jafski, Nov 16, 15:03:29
- I liked his feet up on the dugout roof. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 16, 15:04:49
- that was amazing. I'd love a GIF of that (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Nov 16, 17:48:13
- when you saw him side up to holty, i said to pape diop... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Nov 16, 15:13:11
- His interview was brilliant tho (NCFC) - Old Git, Nov 16, 15:08:15
- He was great. Incredulous at the sheer stupidity of the situation. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Nov 16, 15:06:22
- I liked his feet up on the dugout roof. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 16, 15:04:49
- oliver should be charged with being a CUNT. (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Nov 16, 15:01:05
- Quite right ott, let himself down IMO. Should of stayed calm and collected like I did. (NCFC) - jafski, Nov 16, 15:03:29
- Also, "circumstantial facts" ?! (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 16, 15:00:59
- only circumstantial facts - surely worth an appeal? (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Nov 16, 14:59:18
- It wasn't really though. It was on the basis of a worse tackle on Korey (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Nov 16, 14:54:12
- no it wasnt. (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Nov 16, 14:58:03
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.