Sorry but it looks like a rlegation dog fight . .
and to take off Shacks and not Flemming was a complete mystery.
Only saving grace is that Davenport looks quality and could save us from a few drubbings.
Worst performance in the first half since before Worthy arrived. Deserved the chant of 'What a load of rubbish' because they were.
Passion in the second half but it was all long ball hoofed up to Ashton who looked very frustrated.
And Watford had more than two shots on target - they had three, the third hit the post.
Posted By: canary_wharf on September 14th 2005 at 00:00:08
Message Thread
- Sorry but it looks like a rlegation dog fight . . (NCFC) - canary_wharf, Sep 14, 00:00:08
- how many points do we realistic need to survive? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Sep 14, 00:00:37
- managers normally aim for 50 (n/m) (NCFC) - PaulMcVeighGirl, Sep 14, 00:02:11
- 40 odd (n/m) (NCFC) - iwans_ex_dentist, Sep 14, 00:01:39
- we're on 6 after 8 league games (NCFC) - pants, Sep 14, 00:02:27
- I'd be amazed if we had 20 by Christmas (n/m) (NCFC) - iwans_ex_dentist, Sep 14, 00:03:05
- going by that performance so will i. (n/m) (NCFC) - PaulMcVeighGirl, Sep 14, 00:05:43
- I'd be amazed if we had 20 by Christmas (n/m) (NCFC) - iwans_ex_dentist, Sep 14, 00:03:05
- we're on 6 after 8 league games (NCFC) - pants, Sep 14, 00:02:27
- how many points do we realistic need to survive? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Sep 14, 00:00:37
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.