Let's talk about Charlton
We played them 3 times in the space of 3 weeks when Charlton were coming of the back of the worse start they've ever had in a season I believe.
In the first game at Carrow Road, which we somehow won, despite being totally dreadful and uninspiring, Lita (only on loan) popped up with the winner. The signing of Lita had masked the poorly formed team and squad Roeder had put together and in the next games we this found out well and truly.
The second game, which was at the Valley, we drew 1-1 in a game changed by 3,000 city fans demanding Lupoli to be on the pitch (remembering a similar game against Watford where he never came on and we lost 2-1). Roeder this time decides to give him a chance and instantly he helps us get back in it, eventually getting the equaliser, although this just proved to be pointless as by the return game Roeder had become a joke with the players and fans.
Return game at Carrow Road. We lose 1-0. Charlton's first win in months. Roeder sacked. Nuff said.
Posted By: Brandonio on October 5th 2010 at 17:31:11
Message Thread
- FAO Pants (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 5, 17:13:56
- Charlton (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 5, 17:17:36
- Let's talk about Charlton (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 5, 17:31:11
- I'm gonna abstain if that's ok (NCFC) - pants, Oct 5, 17:38:00
- Let's talk about Charlton (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 5, 17:31:11
- ... (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Oct 5, 17:17:31
- Although that's a home defeat to QPR. Actually, Pants is right. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Oct 5, 17:19:12
- Okay, having explored further, Pants was talking about Charlton. I'll pipe down now. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Oct 5, 17:20:30
- I'm not convinced to be honest, the post follows selwyn's (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 5, 17:23:59
- Wouldn't the stat still stand though? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 5, 17:25:26
- Only in the same sense that I've never lost game at Loftus Road either managing Norwich (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 5, 17:33:26
- Well done! (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Oct 5, 17:35:33
- Only in the same sense that I've never lost game at Loftus Road either managing Norwich (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 5, 17:33:26
- Never mind. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Oct 5, 17:24:23
- It was all just some petty reaction to the rail shite earlier (NCFC) - pants, Oct 5, 17:26:52
- I do (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Oct 5, 17:29:24
- I'm still trying to get something other than an open ticket for the Boro game (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Oct 5, 17:33:01
- Brighton to London, then Caps train? (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 5, 17:35:37
- Could be an option - I want to come back pretty late though. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Oct 5, 17:37:28
- that would be your problem then, latest would 6 I would imagine (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 5, 17:42:50
- Could be an option - I want to come back pretty late though. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Oct 5, 17:37:28
- Brighton to London, then Caps train? (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 5, 17:35:37
- I'm still trying to get something other than an open ticket for the Boro game (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Oct 5, 17:33:01
- I do (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Oct 5, 17:29:24
- It was all just some petty reaction to the rail shite earlier (NCFC) - pants, Oct 5, 17:26:52
- Wouldn't the stat still stand though? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 5, 17:25:26
- I'm not convinced to be honest, the post follows selwyn's (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 5, 17:23:59
- Okay, having explored further, Pants was talking about Charlton. I'll pipe down now. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Oct 5, 17:20:30
- Although that's a home defeat to QPR. Actually, Pants is right. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Oct 5, 17:19:12
- Charlton (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 5, 17:17:36
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.