Which is kind of my point as well
Bertrand was the pick over him when he was fit. It says that if there's definite competition, he's back on the bench
If he was as good as made out, in a position that's well sort after at any club, then where was all the speculation when we went down?
He's an decent ish player, but I wouldn't get carried away about his time here
(maybe I should go back to not saying anything :s. I just don't see what's to be excited about with him, apart from he's been here 7 years)
Posted By: pants on September 29th 2010 at 22:50:13
Message Thread
- this debate about drury.... (NCFC) - conkers, Sep 29, 22:26:17
- Bertrand? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Sep 29, 22:27:41
- injured most of the time. (n/m) (NCFC) - conkers, Sep 29, 22:29:32
- Michael Rose last season? (NCFC) - pants, Sep 29, 22:32:18
- may i refer the honourable member to my previous answer... (n/m) (NCFC) - conkers, Sep 29, 22:34:08
- I'm all for the Drury hall of fame thing (NCFC) - pants, Sep 29, 22:36:02
- not totally dependable? (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Sep 29, 22:38:38
- Well the times I'm mentioning to conkers, the replies are (NCFC) - pants, Sep 29, 22:40:51
- none of them have played ahead of him while he's been fit (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Sep 29, 22:43:45
- Which is kind of my point as well (NCFC) - pants, Sep 29, 22:50:13
- Think Drury is very underrated. Betrand was OK, but not a patch on Drury (NCFC) - Vivid Data Shark, Sep 29, 23:11:16
- Bertrand's only 21 (NCFC) - pants, Sep 29, 23:21:35
- true, he should go onto be a Prem regular at LB in the next few years (NCFC) - Brandonio, Sep 29, 23:28:07
- this was the game, long crossfield ball by Cole right onto the feet of Clinton (NCFC) - Brandonio, Sep 29, 23:33:56
- true, he should go onto be a Prem regular at LB in the next few years (NCFC) - Brandonio, Sep 29, 23:28:07
- Bertrand's only 21 (NCFC) - pants, Sep 29, 23:21:35
- He's been here 9 years (NCFC) - Brandonio, Sep 29, 22:56:09
- cool (NCFC) - pants, Sep 29, 23:08:17
- yeah, he had to cover the entire left flank on his own (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Sep 29, 23:01:19
- Betrand was selected by Roeder ffs (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Sep 29, 22:53:07
- Think Drury is very underrated. Betrand was OK, but not a patch on Drury (NCFC) - Vivid Data Shark, Sep 29, 23:11:16
- Which is kind of my point as well (NCFC) - pants, Sep 29, 22:50:13
- none of them have played ahead of him while he's been fit (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Sep 29, 22:43:45
- Well the times I'm mentioning to conkers, the replies are (NCFC) - pants, Sep 29, 22:40:51
- You are joking I hope. (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 29, 22:37:57
- Can't agree with that one bit, having seen most of his games over the years. Opinions tho (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Sep 29, 22:37:15
- not totally dependable? (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Sep 29, 22:38:38
- I'm all for the Drury hall of fame thing (NCFC) - pants, Sep 29, 22:36:02
- may i refer the honourable member to my previous answer... (n/m) (NCFC) - conkers, Sep 29, 22:34:08
- Drury Lame (n/m) (NCFC) - Buckscanary, Sep 29, 22:30:04
- lol (n/m) (NCFC) - conkers, Sep 29, 22:34:28
- I'll take a bow on that one. It was set up for me though (n/m) (NCFC) - Buckscanary, Sep 29, 22:36:13
- lol (n/m) (NCFC) - conkers, Sep 29, 22:34:28
- Michael Rose last season? (NCFC) - pants, Sep 29, 22:32:18
- injured most of the time. (n/m) (NCFC) - conkers, Sep 29, 22:29:32
- Bertrand? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Sep 29, 22:27:41
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.