we got behind their defence loads
i agree maybe we weren't as good as some say because of the lack of shots but the problem was we were trying to be too cute and too many crosses somehow missed someone knocking it in or hacked away.
Posted By: SCC 28 on September 28th 2010 at 10:22:15
Message Thread
- got to play more attacking tonight (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 28, 10:08:14
- Am I the only person who thought we weren’t that great on Sat? (NCFC) - lurd, Sep 28, 10:19:42
- we got behind their defence loads (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 28, 10:22:15
- Agreed. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Sep 28, 10:22:31
- no idea how barnett i think it was (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 28, 10:24:02
- Aye, was unlucky with the one straight at the keeper. A yard either side and he scored. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Sep 28, 10:37:45
- no idea how barnett i think it was (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 28, 10:24:02
- Agreed. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Sep 28, 10:22:31
- I thought we threatened, but that crosses were either cut out just before a city shirt, or (NCFC) - megson, Sep 28, 10:21:59
- no (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Sep 28, 10:20:15
- we got behind their defence loads (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 28, 10:22:15
- ask pants-he will tell you what we should do (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Sep 28, 10:08:58
- Am I the only person who thought we weren’t that great on Sat? (NCFC) - lurd, Sep 28, 10:19:42
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.