Yes. Been discussed before. COnsensus was that it must be with clauses for promotion etc.
No way we paid that much upfront.
Posted By: jafski on August 11th 2010 at 14:51:09
Message Thread
- Anyone else notice Andrew Surman's (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Aug 11, 14:48:44
- Yes. Been discussed before. COnsensus was that it must be with clauses for promotion etc. (NCFC) - jafski, Aug 11, 14:51:09
- swot i thought, what with jackson as well that would be a lot of cash outlayed (n/m) (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Aug 11, 14:53:32
- A tena for jackson would be alot (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Aug 11, 14:55:34
- nah he'll be good, just needs time to settle (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Aug 11, 14:57:32
- u mean-like a wobbly jelly (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Aug 11, 14:58:51
- nah he'll be good, just needs time to settle (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Aug 11, 14:57:32
- A tena for jackson would be alot (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Aug 11, 14:55:34
- swot i thought, what with jackson as well that would be a lot of cash outlayed (n/m) (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Aug 11, 14:53:32
- omg lambert out (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Aug 11, 14:51:07
- Ban this sick filth^^^^^ (n/m) (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Aug 11, 14:54:25
- Yes. Been discussed before. COnsensus was that it must be with clauses for promotion etc. (NCFC) - jafski, Aug 11, 14:51:09
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.