but not everyone is ideot enough to start labelling things as 'madcap schemes'
unless of course we're talking about spending £100bn on a system of nuclear deterrant that is no longer needed or economically viable in its current guise.
that truly is madcap.
Posted By: Ralf Scrampton on August 11th 2010 at 11:36:44
Message Thread
- BTW, Ralph - (General Chat) - CB41, Aug 11, 11:27:24
- but not everyone is ideot enough to start labelling things as 'madcap schemes' (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Aug 11, 11:36:44
- Yes, poor choice of wording I grant you. I was just using the same phrase (General Chat) - CB41, Aug 11, 11:40:25
- i didnt say mad cap schemes? (n/m) (General Chat) - Tony Martin, Aug 11, 12:21:28
- Yes, beg pardon, you didn't. I seem to haveof got this horribly wrong. As the (General Chat) - CB41, Aug 11, 12:37:08
- putting IVF NHS funding on the same level as starting an illegal war (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Aug 11, 11:54:03
- No, I was putting it in the same bracket as refering to social (General Chat) - CB41, Aug 11, 12:06:03
- nope, that's not even slightly obvious from this post (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Aug 11, 12:10:59
- The war wasn't illegal though was it? (General Chat) - megson, Aug 11, 12:00:52
- No, I was putting it in the same bracket as refering to social (General Chat) - CB41, Aug 11, 12:06:03
- i didnt say mad cap schemes? (n/m) (General Chat) - Tony Martin, Aug 11, 12:21:28
- Yes, poor choice of wording I grant you. I was just using the same phrase (General Chat) - CB41, Aug 11, 11:40:25
- but not everyone is ideot enough to start labelling things as 'madcap schemes' (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Aug 11, 11:36:44
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.