wether it's Hoolahan, Oli, Hughes or whoever that position relies on a big striker
who can bring those players into the game, Chris Martin can't do it, Holt is the only player in the whole of our squad who can, that for me is the weakness, I was surprised when we brought Elliott in because I would rather have gone for a big striker who can replace Holt if required.
Posted By: lovely old job on April 14th 2010 at 09:42:55
Message Thread
- Said to my friend last night if we started with Lappin, Russell, Korey and A N Other . . . (NCFC) - Yellow Ice, Apr 14, 09:03:30
- The midfield is too static without Hughes (n/m) (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Apr 14, 09:04:36
- Hughes is a very good player IMO - he must have thought watching the first half . . . (NCFC) - Yellow Ice, Apr 14, 09:18:59
- I think without Wes we really need him in the team... (NCFC) - Dr Baker, Apr 14, 09:35:43
- sorry should also say ...and McNamee (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Apr 14, 09:06:14
- Oh shit If that's the best we can come up with it looks very weak. (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, Apr 14, 09:07:47
- Does it? (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Apr 14, 09:15:49
- a defence that can no longer defend set pieces, Oli is a 20 minute player at the end of (NCFC) - lovely old job, Apr 14, 09:23:38
- That is a ridiculous team selection. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellow Ice, Apr 14, 09:27:20
- this is a ridiculous midfield selection (NCFC) - lovely old job, Apr 14, 09:31:19
- As was last night's (n/m) (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Apr 14, 09:28:52
- we clearly expected Orient not to threaten (NCFC) - camcan, Apr 14, 09:35:40
- Chill out, darlin (NCFC) - Huge Small, Apr 14, 09:55:37
- I'm sure we will be (NCFC) - camcan, Apr 14, 10:18:49
- wether it's Hoolahan, Oli, Hughes or whoever that position relies on a big striker (NCFC) - lovely old job, Apr 14, 09:42:55
- I agree with loj (NCFC) - Claygate_Canary, Apr 14, 09:52:12
- just someone to hold up the ball (NCFC) - camcan, Apr 14, 09:48:40
- Par breaks please - a gret ole block of black words on a yellow background after 4 hours' (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Apr 14, 09:39:14
- What gave it away was (NCFC) - camcan, Apr 14, 09:47:22
- Chill out, darlin (NCFC) - Huge Small, Apr 14, 09:55:37
- we clearly expected Orient not to threaten (NCFC) - camcan, Apr 14, 09:35:40
- good (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, Apr 14, 09:27:40
- That is a ridiculous team selection. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellow Ice, Apr 14, 09:27:20
- a defence that can no longer defend set pieces, Oli is a 20 minute player at the end of (NCFC) - lovely old job, Apr 14, 09:23:38
- Does it? (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Apr 14, 09:15:49
- Oh shit If that's the best we can come up with it looks very weak. (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, Apr 14, 09:07:47
- Hughes is a very good player IMO - he must have thought watching the first half . . . (NCFC) - Yellow Ice, Apr 14, 09:18:59
- The midfield is too static without Hughes (n/m) (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Apr 14, 09:04:36
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.