What I was saying was
All you do when you pull me up for it, is you shift the balance of power over to them. You open up so many avenues for them to have a field day
So when you pull me up for baiting as you put it, you're actually being the bait for them "spot on mate"
It's this whole democracy/alliance thing on here (tag team). You just come across as siding with them when you reply to me, and they run with it
Which is why I don't like you doing it, and often I don't understand your point (again, because they're setting down bait after bait on here, yet when I pull them up, you jump on my post instantly)
In the realms of so much s**t I get on here (some you probably think I start myself), I quite like pulling up/baiting scc. I enjoy making a mockery of his week by week hypocritical bulls**t
Just like you guys like doing so with usacanary
If this site wants a level playing field, I'm all for it, (moderators, evened out criticism etc). But if it's not going to happen, and I get a load of grief about posting about manchester utd, whilst no one gets s**te for posting about the sodding winter boring olympics
Then I'm going to get annoyed at various people pulling me up for doing what everyone does
Again, it's got nothing to do with 2 wrongs making a right. It's like a sign on a river saying anyone fishing will be prosecuted, then 10 people turning up to fish, and only one getting arrested. Then the other 9 carry on fishing
Posted By: pants on February 23rd 2010 at 15:16:30
Message Thread
- OFFICIAL SMS: Russell appeal turned down- three match ban (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Feb 23, 13:34:21
- i need a new phone (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 23, 13:53:04
- mine does too (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 23, 14:28:27
- What a surprise. I didn't see that coming a mile off (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 13:48:20
- the video evidence was damning unfortunately (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 23, 13:50:33
- ^^secretly loving it because he hates Russell (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 13:54:23
- ^^ not secretly hoping it will kick off (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 23, 13:56:25
- TAG TEAM! (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 14:09:07
- Come off it. You clearly baited the hook on that one. As you did the other day as well. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 23, 14:11:35
- And him being the only one who doubts whether it was a red or not (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 14:18:08
- most people agree the video evidence looks bad (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 23, 14:33:34
- I have to say, the one and only angle I have seen it from, i.e. the Beeb (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 23, 14:36:17
- I was seething (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 23, 14:41:31
- exactly and it needs to be conclusive to reverse the decision (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 23, 14:38:27
- I have to say, the one and only angle I have seen it from, i.e. the Beeb (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 23, 14:36:17
- possibly. I see your point. I never get your 'two wrongs make a right' attitude though. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 23, 14:25:27
- Because it's obvious that he's loving the decision (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 14:34:06
- I wouldn't get so worried about it. Most people let his posts wash over them. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 23, 14:34:55
- As you could pulling me up for it (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 14:44:15
- Sorry if that's arsey (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 14:48:38
- I dont understand why: (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 23, 14:57:07
- Because it's my way of enjoying it too (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 15:02:16
- I dont think you are the one who is starting the trouble. (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 23, 15:07:44
- What I was saying was (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 15:16:30
- You see it as a comptetion between you two. I cant do anything about that. (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 23, 15:39:54
- I don't want to defend this by deflecting (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 15:49:15
- .... (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 15:52:10
- (as an aside - you'll notice I am far more restrained around usa now (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 23, 16:00:57
- .... (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 15:52:10
- I don't want to defend this by deflecting (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 15:49:15
- does it really matter (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 23, 15:27:35
- You haven't even read any of the threads (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 15:31:20
- what threads (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 23, 15:34:48
- Is Brighton still a town? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 15:37:26
- another non seq thingy (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 23, 15:40:06
- Yeah, you never do that (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 15:55:26
- another non seq thingy (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 23, 15:40:06
- Is Brighton still a town? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 15:37:26
- what threads (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 23, 15:34:48
- You haven't even read any of the threads (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 15:31:20
- You see it as a comptetion between you two. I cant do anything about that. (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 23, 15:39:54
- What I was saying was (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 15:16:30
- I dont think you are the one who is starting the trouble. (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 23, 15:07:44
- spot on mate (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 23, 14:58:31
- Because it's my way of enjoying it too (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 15:02:16
- I dont understand why: (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 23, 14:57:07
- you tell him (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 23, 14:46:08
- Sorry if that's arsey (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 14:48:38
- agreed it's just the internet (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 23, 14:37:59
- As you could pulling me up for it (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 14:44:15
- I wouldn't get so worried about it. Most people let his posts wash over them. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 23, 14:34:55
- Because it's obvious that he's loving the decision (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 14:34:06
- most people agree the video evidence looks bad (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 23, 14:33:34
- And him being the only one who doubts whether it was a red or not (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 14:18:08
- Come off it. You clearly baited the hook on that one. As you did the other day as well. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 23, 14:11:35
- TAG TEAM! (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 14:09:07
- hate's a strong word (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 23, 13:55:58
- ^^ not secretly hoping it will kick off (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 23, 13:56:25
- I haven't (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 23, 13:54:06
- part timer (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 23, 13:55:33
- ^^secretly loving it because he hates Russell (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 23, 13:54:23
- the video evidence was damning unfortunately (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 23, 13:50:33
- oh well (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 23, 13:46:26
- I should be shocked, I'm not though. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Feb 23, 13:39:16
- How the fuck does that work? Unbelieveable. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 23, 13:37:13
- the ref didn't think he got it wrong imo (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 23, 13:38:26
- at times like this I wish Ferguson managed us. (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, Feb 23, 13:38:14
- absolute madness. (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, Feb 23, 13:36:46
- knew it would stick (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 23, 13:35:18
- Me too - not an obvious enough mistake (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 23, 13:39:38
- surely it's down to how deliberate it was (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 23, 13:40:37
- They hardly ever change their minds though (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 23, 13:49:18
- although he may have just sent him off for pure recklessness (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 23, 13:51:59
- then he should have sent of the Saints player 1st half that nearly took Russell;s head off (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Feb 23, 14:22:01
- like martin taylor on eduardo (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 23, 13:53:32
- although he may have just sent him off for pure recklessness (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 23, 13:51:59
- They hardly ever change their minds though (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 23, 13:49:18
- surely it's down to how deliberate it was (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 23, 13:40:37
- Me too - not an obvious enough mistake (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 23, 13:39:38
- Cunts (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 23, 13:35:03
- i need a new phone (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 23, 13:53:04
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.