if russells sending off is upheld could be a blessing in disguise

-will mean changing the team! something which has clearly been needed for a while now,but lambert never drops anyone on form alone-so im not too bothered if it is upheld to be honest

Posted By: selwyn on February 22nd 2010 at 16:16:04

Message Thread

if russells sending off is upheld could be a blessing in disguise (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 22, 16:16:04
- why would you change a winning side just for the sake of it? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 22, 16:26:03
  - Well, we have lost 2 of the last 3, so winning team isn't very accurate anymore (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 22, 18:35:40
    - seltard was suggesting Lambert refuses to change a winning team (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 22, 18:48:21
  - you shouldn't really but (NCFC) - big member, Feb 22, 16:30:53
    - Nelson was brillaint versus Brighton. Without him, we would have been 2-0 down and buried. (n/m) (NCFC) - songwriter, Feb 22, 16:36:28
      - I did not see th whole game against Brighton (NCFC) - big member, Feb 22, 16:41:19
        
        I don't rate Nelson either (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 22, 16:58:56
    - hes a clown (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 22, 16:33:02
      - I am sure he is doing his best (NCFC) - big member, Feb 22, 16:35:20
  - when was the last time lambert actually dropped a player? september? (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 22, 16:30:05
  - wouldn't be for the sake of it (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 22, 16:29:56
  - if you have a better player on the bench-thats when (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Feb 22, 16:29:10
    - who? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 22, 17:08:03

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.