No defence I'm afraid.

Even 'allegedly' can't keep you safe from libel laws.

It's now up to NOTW to prove that Norwich ARE going into administration... or their goose is cooked I'm afraid.

Posted By: Jim Nasium on January 24th 2010 at 15:25:49

Message Thread

There wouldn't be any scope for action against notw (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Jan 24, 15:23:50
- I very much doubt this will go to a trial (n/m) (NCFC) - iwans_ex_dentist, Jan 24, 15:35:52
- Makes no difference - but any damages are (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 24, 15:29:34
  - exactly, waste of time (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 24, 15:32:41
    - NOTW will probably have to pay that if we win (n/m) (NCFC) - iwans_ex_dentist, Jan 24, 15:33:33
      - NOTW will be ordered to pay legal fees (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 24, 15:34:38
        
        apart from proving to any of our suppliers that there is no truth in it whatsoever (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 24, 15:35:39
        
        good point (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 24, 15:36:22
- To suggest that someone or a company etc is insolvent etc is defamatory (n/m) (NCFC) - iwans_ex_dentist, Jan 24, 15:27:30
- No defence I'm afraid. (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Jan 24, 15:25:49
  - Do u think the club would take action against them? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Jan 24, 15:27:35
    - er (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jan 24, 15:28:26
      - Lol not seen that, been out all day. Have club released statement then I take it (n/m) (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Jan 24, 15:30:23
  - I learned that on Have I Got News For You. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 24, 15:27:24
    - I saw that too... (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Jan 24, 15:35:08
      - Yes yes! (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 24, 15:37:40
        
        my first home game of the season (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 24, 15:38:47
        
        actually no it isn't (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 24, 15:39:31
    - Allegedly can work on court reports (n/m) (NCFC) - iwans_ex_dentist, Jan 24, 15:29:29
    - They are! (n/m) (NCFC) - iwans_ex_dentist, Jan 24, 15:28:58
- Financial experts Ernst Young and KPMG have both been called in as potential administrator (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jan 24, 15:25:07
  - so we need to prove we haven't spoken to them about anything (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 24, 15:26:16
    - This isn't Wrath Wrules - we don't have to provide a link or remember more than 1 week (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 24, 15:31:03
      - Haha (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 24, 15:32:56
      - lol (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 24, 15:31:42
    - no (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jan 24, 15:27:19
      - The burden of proof is on the defendant - NotW have to prove we've called them in. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 24, 15:29:04
      - We don't need to prove anything. (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Jan 24, 15:28:57
- [administrators] HAVE been called in = barefaced lie. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 24, 15:24:47

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.