bugs me
he may well become burnley manager but it won't have a lot to do with bookies always getting it right
Posted By: SCC 28 on January 8th 2010 at 10:12:08
Message Thread
- Don't want to sound like a merchant of doom but.... (NCFC) - Chopper, Jan 8, 09:07:26
- and what is this wrong? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 09:22:51
- all right, calm down... (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 8, 09:52:34
- bugs me (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 10:12:08
- I agree with that actually. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 8, 10:17:35
- bugs me (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 10:12:08
- all right, calm down... (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 8, 09:52:34
- Well according to an Oinkun poster, the Burnley local rag ran through the favourites for (NCFC) - megson, Jan 8, 09:17:08
- what the fuck are you talking about (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 09:13:55
- didn't about coyle to bolton (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 09:19:07
- haha Hiddink 33/1 (n/m) (NCFC) - samcd84, Jan 8, 10:00:12
- didn't about coyle to bolton (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 09:19:07
- they dont tend to be that good at setting managers odds though (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Jan 8, 09:12:35
- Bookies often do get it wrong, especially when their odds (NCFC) - conker, Jan 8, 09:11:42
- So are you saying Brian Laws is 2nd favourite for the job then? (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, Jan 8, 09:11:24
- Odds (NCFC) - wilkia4, Jan 8, 09:10:58
- and what is this wrong? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 09:22:51
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.