BANGS HEAD AGAINST WALL
I am not saying that the gamble of 03/04 didn't work.
What I am saying is that the same gamble failed on at least four subsequent occasions - as did the gamble of 95/6.
We cannot afford to lose so I do not think we should be taking the gamble.
And the size of our fanbase should be enough to maintain an average wage bill.
Posted By: jayson blair on January 8th 2010 at 00:39:20
Message Thread
- Read it and Weep (NCFC) - jayson blair, Jan 7, 22:30:41
- "In 03-04 we spent 87 per cent of turnover on wages" (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 7, 22:56:55
- 87 per cent of income is exactly that (NCFC) - jayson blair, Jan 7, 23:04:30
- It was also the season we won the League........ (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 7, 23:41:04
- and what happened (NCFC) - jayson blair, Jan 8, 00:18:49
- But the calculated risk paid off........ (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 8, 00:29:45
- BANGS HEAD AGAINST WALL (NCFC) - jayson blair, Jan 8, 00:39:20
- But the calculated risk paid off........ (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 8, 00:29:45
- and what happened (NCFC) - jayson blair, Jan 8, 00:18:49
- It was also the season we won the League........ (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 7, 23:41:04
- 87 per cent of income is exactly that (NCFC) - jayson blair, Jan 7, 23:04:30
- "In 03-04 we spent 87 per cent of turnover on wages" (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 7, 22:56:55
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.