I guessed so
but wasn't there so no idea. Just seems odd nobody else there
Posted By: Charles21 on November 16th 2009 at 12:47:29
Message Thread
- Why for our 2nd goal was Doc (NCFC) - Charles21, Nov 16, 12:33:06
- My question: did he actually backheel it in... (NCFC) - Greeny, Nov 16, 12:55:30
- I thought it was a back heel (NCFC) - camcan, Nov 16, 12:56:49
- Tumbly text me at the time and said "Cruijff-esque. Seriously." (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 16, 13:54:09
- I thought it was a back heel (NCFC) - camcan, Nov 16, 12:56:49
- Hazy memory, but hadn't we just had a corner of free kick or summat? (NCFC) - megson, Nov 16, 12:42:09
- I guessed so (NCFC) - Charles21, Nov 16, 12:47:29
- right, had assumed it was something like that (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 16, 12:45:25
- we were 1-0 up (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 16, 12:35:25
- Why was our centre back there then? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 16, 12:38:06
- He was still up from the corner we had just taken. Correct play IMO - sustain attack (NCFC) - Yellow Ice, Nov 16, 12:42:39
- SUPER PAUL LAMBERT (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 16, 12:43:47
- because they wouldn't expect it? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 16, 12:40:27
- He was still up from the corner we had just taken. Correct play IMO - sustain attack (NCFC) - Yellow Ice, Nov 16, 12:42:39
- Why was our centre back there then? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 16, 12:38:06
- My question: did he actually backheel it in... (NCFC) - Greeny, Nov 16, 12:55:30
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.