Don't start. What pants said was factually correct. He didn't mention the away defeats.
Posted By: jafski on November 12th 2009 at 15:00:21
Message Thread
- We've only lost twice in the league under Lamborghini; both times we've been on the telly (NCFC) - Old Git, Nov 12, 14:45:53
- We won on telly under Roeder (NCFC) - pants, Nov 12, 14:47:08
- Your logic is undeniable (n/m) (NCFC) - legendhuckerby, Nov 12, 14:58:41
- So the choice is get Roeder back and pay Sky to be on telly all the time (NCFC) - Old Git, Nov 12, 14:51:45
- I say get Roeder back (NCFC) - legendhuckerby, Nov 12, 15:03:45
- Your facts are impeccably correct. Good work. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Nov 12, 14:50:43
- Impeccable (NCFC) - Old Git, Nov 12, 14:52:57
- You can't argue with facts. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Nov 12, 14:56:51
- Those 10 away defeats were NOTHING to do with Roeder (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 12, 14:55:20
- Don't start. What pants said was factually correct. He didn't mention the away defeats. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Nov 12, 15:00:21
- Sorry (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 12, 15:05:53
- OK. Carry on, as you were. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Nov 12, 15:08:51
- Yeah DOY, stop trying to start internet fights (n/m) (NCFC) - legendhuckerby, Nov 12, 15:04:56
- Yeah. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Nov 12, 15:05:26
- Yeah (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 12, 15:08:24
- Yeah. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Nov 12, 15:05:26
- Sorry (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 12, 15:05:53
- Don't start. What pants said was factually correct. He didn't mention the away defeats. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Nov 12, 15:00:21
- Impeccable (NCFC) - Old Git, Nov 12, 14:52:57
- We won on telly under Roeder (NCFC) - pants, Nov 12, 14:47:08
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.