agreed
Posted By: SCC 28 on November 4th 2009 at 11:56:55
Message Thread
- ❶ Bryan Gunn (n/m) (General Chat) - Charles21, Nov 4, 11:22:47
- We'd be top if he was still here. It's his team. Mind you, Roeder would of kept us up. (General Chat) - jafski, Nov 4, 11:35:34
- At least deserved the opportunity to after doing so the season before (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Nov 4, 11:40:49
- I think we would of had more chance of surviving with Roeder than with Gunn. (General Chat) - jafski, Nov 4, 11:46:26
- i disagree with that opinion (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 4, 11:50:03
- their points per game records certainly back that up (General Chat) - SCC 28, Nov 4, 11:52:44
- points per game records are very unfair (General Chat) - Charles21, Nov 4, 11:55:54
- If you were Andy Townsend, you would replace all those 'effectively's with 'literally's (n/m) (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 4, 11:59:43
- and gunn still managed to have a better record (General Chat) - SCC 28, Nov 4, 11:58:02
- Super Glenn Roeder. (n/m) (General Chat) - jafski, Nov 4, 12:01:16
- Roeder is a better manager than Gunn. No doubt. Dpso fatso, we'd of stood a better (General Chat) - jafski, Nov 4, 11:54:36
- yes, he certainly is a better manager (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 4, 12:07:02
- all i know is (General Chat) - SCC 28, Nov 4, 11:56:43
- Roeder was poor. But not on the same cunt-o-meter scale as Hamilton. Trust me. (n/m) (General Chat) - Snakey, Nov 4, 11:59:42
- My work here is done. (n/m) (General Chat) - jafski, Nov 4, 11:58:58
- yep run away (General Chat) - SCC 28, Nov 4, 11:59:44
- disagreed (n/m) (General Chat) - Charles21, Nov 4, 11:56:07
- agreed (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Nov 4, 11:56:55
- points per game records are very unfair (General Chat) - Charles21, Nov 4, 11:55:54
- their points per game records certainly back that up (General Chat) - SCC 28, Nov 4, 11:52:44
- i think they were both equally as shocking tbh (General Chat) - SCC 28, Nov 4, 11:49:46
- and that useless cunt Croft (n/m) (General Chat) - Charles21, Nov 4, 11:52:44
- i forgot the useless cunt bottler croft (General Chat) - SCC 28, Nov 4, 11:53:18
- POTS Looooooooooooooooooool (n/m) (General Chat) - Charles21, Nov 4, 11:59:43
- i forgot the useless cunt bottler croft (General Chat) - SCC 28, Nov 4, 11:53:18
- and that useless cunt Croft (n/m) (General Chat) - Charles21, Nov 4, 11:52:44
- i disagree with that opinion (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 4, 11:50:03
- yep he always earns the opportunity (General Chat) - SCC 28, Nov 4, 11:45:08
- Unlike Gunn, who was special, special needs. In football management terms. (n/m) (General Chat) - jafski, Nov 4, 11:47:24
- prove it (n/m) (General Chat) - Charles21, Nov 4, 11:47:51
- If you'd bothered attending my Seminar - Bryan Gunn + Football management = Car Crash (General Chat) - jafski, Nov 4, 11:52:04
- any link? (n/m) (General Chat) - Charles21, Nov 4, 11:53:09
- Yes, there are some. (n/m) (General Chat) - jafski, Nov 4, 11:55:09
- any link? (n/m) (General Chat) - Charles21, Nov 4, 11:53:09
- If you'd bothered attending my Seminar - Bryan Gunn + Football management = Car Crash (General Chat) - jafski, Nov 4, 11:52:04
- prove it (n/m) (General Chat) - Charles21, Nov 4, 11:47:51
- Unlike Gunn, who was special, special needs. In football management terms. (n/m) (General Chat) - jafski, Nov 4, 11:47:24
- agreed (n/m) (General Chat) - Charles21, Nov 4, 11:41:05
- I think we would of had more chance of surviving with Roeder than with Gunn. (General Chat) - jafski, Nov 4, 11:46:26
- At least deserved the opportunity to after doing so the season before (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Nov 4, 11:40:49
- FAIL (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Nov 4, 11:29:39
- What's the loser done now? (n/m) (General Chat) - stringersrevenge, Nov 4, 11:26:03
- will he be the expert seether for ITV? (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Nov 4, 11:31:47
- blah blah still dont understand why i got sacked blah blah, my team doing well blah blah (n/m) (General Chat) - Snakey, Nov 4, 11:32:24
- will he be the expert seether for ITV? (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Nov 4, 11:31:47
- ^^^ good use of a "square", that!^^^ (n/m) (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Nov 4, 11:23:21
- ^^^using internet exploiter^^^ (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Nov 4, 11:27:41
- excuse me? (n/m) (General Chat) - Charles21, Nov 4, 11:25:35
- errr, the square thingy before the words "bryan" and "gunn" - good use mate! (n/m) (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Nov 4, 11:27:24
- Oh, I didn't do it (General Chat) - Charles21, Nov 4, 11:34:17
- ❶ No idea (n/m) (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Nov 4, 11:42:08
- Oh, I didn't do it (General Chat) - Charles21, Nov 4, 11:34:17
- errr, the square thingy before the words "bryan" and "gunn" - good use mate! (n/m) (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Nov 4, 11:27:24
- We'd be top if he was still here. It's his team. Mind you, Roeder would of kept us up. (General Chat) - jafski, Nov 4, 11:35:34
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.