And by that are you implying...

...that most young footballers wear nappies well into their teens?! I expect they have to be told when to wipe, but that's surely restrictive of their running abilites?

Posted By: DJ Ginga on October 25th 2009 at 17:27:51

Message Thread

Nearest comparisons I can come up with... (NCFC) - DJ Ginga, Oct 25, 16:45:20
- We beat Tamworth 4-1 (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 25, 19:08:56
  - Great strike - yes! i remember! (NCFC) - DJ Ginga, Oct 26, 01:31:28
    - When was it? (NCFC) - DJ Ginga, Oct 26, 01:41:52
      - Good 'ol Norwich City MAD... (NCFC) - DJ Ginga, Oct 26, 01:57:52
  - Were lucky not to be behind against Tamworth (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Oct 25, 20:10:27
    - Nice idea. Should do the same for mine! (n/m) (NCFC) - DJ Ginga, Oct 26, 01:32:25
  - . (NCFC) - double hipness, Oct 25, 19:15:35
- (11th according to SSN. Bloody Wiki!) (n/m) (NCFC) - DJ Ginga, Oct 25, 17:25:57
- To be fair our reserves were pretty comfortable against Gillingham the other week (n/m) (NCFC) - Klobo04, Oct 25, 16:50:19
  - To be fair? You're supporting what I said not contradicting it. (NCFC) - DJ Ginga, Oct 25, 16:58:24
    - Yeah I was implying that by full time against Gillingham (NCFC) - Klobo04, Oct 25, 17:01:28
      - And by that are you implying... (NCFC) - DJ Ginga, Oct 25, 17:27:51
        
        would a nappy be considered an outside agent (NCFC) - double hipness, Oct 25, 18:01:23
    - Oh. Do you mean 'reserves' as in sarcy reserves not actual reserves? (n/m) (NCFC) - DJ Ginga, Oct 25, 16:59:31

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.