as per the severity of the incident.
This isnt a case of object throwing and hitting someone.
This is a illegal object causing an advantage to one team.
Yes the ref should have stopped the game and removed the object. he didnt.. his error.
Yes he should have played a drop ball when the ball hit the other ball and went in.. his error.
i am surprised not only he got it wrong, but apparently he spoke to the the other ass ref and 4th official.
Posted By: roland rat on October 19th 2009 at 19:36:12
Message Thread
- Hurrah for common sense ! Nothing wrong with Sunderland's goal. (Other Football) - Arganth, Oct 19, 18:42:46
- where does it say that? (Other Football) - roland rat, Oct 19, 19:04:23
- Can you show me why it's no goal ? (n/m) (Other Football) - Arganth, Oct 19, 19:07:32
- law 5 (Other Football) - roland rat, Oct 19, 19:14:54
- Pages 62 & 64 (n/m) (Other Football) - Arganth, Oct 19, 19:11:24
- its not an extra player, its an interference (Other Football) - roland rat, Oct 19, 19:18:56
- As per above... (Other Football) - Arganth, Oct 19, 19:27:27
- as per the severity of the incident. (Other Football) - roland rat, Oct 19, 19:36:12
- As per above... (Other Football) - Arganth, Oct 19, 19:27:27
- its not an extra player, its an interference (Other Football) - roland rat, Oct 19, 19:18:56
- Can you show me why it's no goal ? (n/m) (Other Football) - Arganth, Oct 19, 19:07:32
- where does it say that? (Other Football) - roland rat, Oct 19, 19:04:23
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.