but they were still playing the W formation then - Wrath of the Barclay

but they were still playing the W formation then

with 5 forwards and stuff. So you can't really compare. Used to be a lot more high scores in those days.

Posted By: duke of york on August 10th 2009 at 15:43:09

Message Thread

Reference to 1946 brings little comfort .... (NCFC) - paulg, Aug 10, 15:35:24
- Escpecially not when my fiancee is an AFC Bournemouth supporter (NCFC) - tim berry, Aug 10, 15:42:43
- Who else wondered what those two links were really going to say? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Aug 10, 15:36:47
  - i'm guessing that we won 7-2 at Brighton and went down? (n/m) (NCFC) - bobble, Aug 10, 15:39:24
    - I reckon it's the year Mr Roeder Snr went 6 in midfield whilst Mrs Roeder went up top (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Aug 10, 15:42:40
    - We also lost 1-6 twice (NCFC) - duke of york, Aug 10, 15:40:07
      - so all in all it made no sense. Still no rationing now eh! (n/m) (NCFC) - bobble, Aug 10, 15:42:21
        
        but they were still playing the W formation then (NCFC) - duke of york, Aug 10, 15:43:09
        
        well all that means is that our 1 was the disgrace not their 6!! (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 10, 16:17:36

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.