Without overreacting how many players are really not good enough ?
I know how having a player on the pitch who isn't doing their job can end up screwing everyone else up as they try to cover for them and make decisions they shouldn't make. Also avoid passes etc so it can totally screw up a team.
Where all 11 really not up to it ?
I suspect Martin and Holt can't really be judged on yesterday's showing.
From what I could see the defence cost us. I suspect complete lack of faith in the defence probably screwed up the midfield. I've heard conflicting reports about Gill. Tudor-Jones seems to have had a shocker but is he really not good enough for this level ?*Everyone* in the game seems to rate him. Hoolahoop was dire yesterday but is clearly good enough.
Whalley sounds like he had a mare.
Semmy clearly should no longer pull on a city shirt.
Ditto Doh and Nelson. And don't even start me on Clit.
So by my count thats 4 definate rejects and a likely 5th.
Posted By: matgore on August 9th 2009 at 12:25:58
Message Thread
- Without overreacting how many players are really not good enough ? (NCFC) - matgore, Aug 9, 12:25:58
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.