Well he did - Wrath of the Barclay

Well he did

Remember him taking Velasco off after about 15? And actually Velasco was probably as bad as anything we saw yesterday. Which is a comfort.

Posted By: Chester Drawers on August 9th 2009 at 11:48:41

Message Thread

What was more pointless? (NCFC) - Chester Drawers, Aug 9, 11:17:18
- How shit do you have to perform before you are substituted? (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Aug 9, 11:26:15
  - I agree, I thought that very think. unbelievable (NCFC) - Wayne Biggins, Aug 9, 11:32:29
    - Even Roeder would have probably hauled some of them off after going 3-nil down (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Aug 9, 11:45:27
      - Well he did (NCFC) - Chester Drawers, Aug 9, 11:48:41
        
        I remember that we were only 2-nil down at the time. (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Aug 9, 11:56:45
        
        We were only 1 down (NCFC) - Chester Drawers, Aug 9, 12:02:04
        
        You're right, it was at Coventry. 2 subs in the first half. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Aug 9, 12:19:40
  - And what, exactly, was the point in signing (NCFC) - duke of york, Aug 9, 11:28:34
    - A couple of points (NCFC) - Chester Drawers, Aug 9, 11:30:37
      - A slimmer waistline? (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Aug 9, 11:31:17
        
        That's roughly as much use as (NCFC) - Chester Drawers, Aug 9, 11:34:08

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.