not competely true

if we hadn't only scraped 3 points from our first 4 games, 3 at home, and looked sh*t in the process, then I think the board would feel more comfortable turning down a big money bid.

Posted By: Tricky Hawes on August 22nd 2005 at 14:57:07

Message Thread

We can lay blame at Worthy's door for many things BUT (NCFC) - Burge, Aug 22, 14:54:49
- Looks Like The Board (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Aug 22, 15:05:36
  - His agent isn't an "agent" (NCFC) - roywallerslovechild, Aug 22, 15:07:13
- Yeah but, no but ... (NCFC) - roywallerslovechild, Aug 22, 15:02:45
- Don't entirely agree (NCFC) - Winged Eel Creosote, Aug 22, 14:59:05
  - I disagree....... (NCFC) - Burge, Aug 22, 15:02:22
    - I disagree......... (NCFC) - Winged Eel Creosote, Aug 22, 15:07:14
    - surely "lack of application" (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 22, 15:06:50
- not competely true (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Aug 22, 14:57:07
  - I thought i was depressive at the moment but (NCFC) - Burge, Aug 22, 15:00:05
- we told wigan he wasn't for sale (NCFC) - Dave in France, Aug 22, 14:56:47
- Yep, writing was on the wall when we were made 'faves' for the title (NCFC) - Yellow Jersey, Aug 22, 14:55:56

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.