its been updated - it previously said..."are 3 wickets from defeat at 167-8"
Posted By: Tony Martin on May 18th 2009 at 13:26:34
Message Thread
- Spot the deliberate mistake (Other Sports) - Tony Martin, May 18, 13:10:45
- two wickets from defeat? (Other Sports) - Tricky Hawes, May 18, 13:13:49
- But they are, aren't they? (n/m) (Other Sports) - CB41, May 18, 13:23:48
- its been updated - it previously said..."are 3 wickets from defeat at 167-8" (n/m) (Other Sports) - Tony Martin, May 18, 13:26:34
- That's what I thought... (Other Sports) - Bezley, May 18, 13:24:37
- It said they were three wickets from defeat (n/m) (Other Sports) - Tricky Hawes, May 18, 13:27:23
- is the correct answer! (n/m) (Other Sports) - Tony Martin, May 18, 13:22:42
- But they are, aren't they? (n/m) (Other Sports) - CB41, May 18, 13:23:48
- two wickets from defeat? (Other Sports) - Tricky Hawes, May 18, 13:13:49
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.