When it seemed we'd be building a hald decent, mid table squad i saw the logic.
Wasn't convinced he'd add much to that, and we'd still have the distraction of "why didn't huckleberry play neyul?"
However, seeing as where we did end up, could he have improved the team we did have?
Without a doubt.
Improve it by 5 points? Quite possibly yes.
Posted By: megson on May 12th 2009 at 14:21:23
Message Thread
- I can't help thinking if Hucks hadn't been forced out we would of stayed up. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, May 12, 13:18:09
- When it seemed we'd be building a hald decent, mid table squad i saw the logic. (NCFC) - megson, May 12, 14:21:23
- *half* even Brom knew (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, May 12, 14:33:17
- I can't help thinking when this is said (NCFC) - pants, May 12, 13:39:25
- I can't help thinking (NCFC) - Old Git, May 12, 13:55:31
- *right-back* (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, May 12, 14:00:17
- good point (NCFC) - Old Git, May 12, 14:01:12
- ^^^ Turns maps upside down. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, May 12, 14:17:40
- good point (NCFC) - Old Git, May 12, 14:01:12
- *right-back* (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, May 12, 14:00:17
- HUCKS IS ALEG.END YUO WHO-DONT GOTO HOME CANT SAY.lol (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, May 12, 13:41:30
- Not if the opposition play a 4-2-4 formation. (n/m) (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, May 12, 13:40:19
- I can't help thinking (NCFC) - Old Git, May 12, 13:55:31
- The way he was treated was a disgrace I tell ya - (NCFC) - CB41, May 12, 13:31:06
- We should have one more game for him. (NCFC) - jafski, May 12, 13:34:42
- and David Marshall - disgracefull treatment, selling him (NCFC) - CB41, May 12, 13:36:19
- He'd only fail to come out for it and watch it sail over his head to an unmarked forward a (NCFC) - jafski, May 12, 13:40:35
- i've never forgiven him for that day at Fulham... (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, May 12, 13:39:03
- and David Marshall - disgracefull treatment, selling him (NCFC) - CB41, May 12, 13:36:19
- We should have one more game for him. (NCFC) - jafski, May 12, 13:34:42
- If Hucks stay (NCFC) - XXL16, May 12, 13:25:21
- we scored more goals this season than last season so maybe not (NCFC) - mr carra, May 12, 14:33:42
- David Marshall would still have been in goals though (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, May 12, 13:29:40
- with Gallagher in goals we would've done a play off (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, May 12, 13:32:12
- Or Big Joe Lewis (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, May 12, 13:55:55
- with Gallagher in goals we would've done a play off (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, May 12, 13:32:12
- ^^^ Chris Waddle (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, May 12, 13:27:10
- Yes but David, Captain Canary is putting on weight. Less of the carbs and ice cream, more (NCFC) - jafski, May 12, 13:26:53
- What about Hartson? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, May 12, 13:18:25
- If he hadn't been forced out... (NCFC) - Basil Wrathbone, May 12, 13:19:58
- FAO Yellalee (NCFC) - Monty Peculiar, May 12, 13:22:50
- Bugger - no, I didnt. Won't be for a week now... (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, May 12, 13:23:34
- well, in your own time... (NCFC) - Monty Peculiar, May 12, 13:31:55
- disagrace (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, May 12, 13:25:10
- and a disgrace (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, May 12, 13:25:20
- Bugger - no, I didnt. Won't be for a week now... (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, May 12, 13:23:34
- FAO Yellalee (NCFC) - Monty Peculiar, May 12, 13:22:50
- Don't get me started on Big John. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, May 12, 13:19:33
- If he hadn't been forced out... (NCFC) - Basil Wrathbone, May 12, 13:19:58
- When it seemed we'd be building a hald decent, mid table squad i saw the logic. (NCFC) - megson, May 12, 14:21:23
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.