Not shooting the messenger, but this is another thing I don't believe anymore

these convenient figures always come along at the exact time

Just like the Strihavka thing, 750k, to 250k to being on loan

The club lie way too often about it, which is why it doesn't surprise me that we don't know what Cardiff are paying

Mainly because it's another yarn to be spun when it suits (ie if we only get 200-300k, then the 600k signing suits)

Posted By: pants on May 12th 2009 at 12:11:24

Message Thread

Just a note on Marshall - I have it on reasonably good authority he cost us 600k, not 1m.. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, May 12, 12:08:31
- the accounts said (NCFC) - east of hampstead, May 12, 13:49:01
- ?750k on that always accurate source (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, May 12, 12:19:16
  - Think that is what reports said he would cost before we signed him, when he was on loon (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, May 12, 12:20:51
- Not shooting the messenger, but this is another thing I don't believe anymore (NCFC) - pants, May 12, 12:11:24
  - transfer fees are always a bit vague (NCFC) - Charles21, May 12, 12:30:43
  - I have known that for a fair while actually - but yes, point taken (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, May 12, 12:12:00
- so its a ?500k loss then. (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, May 12, 12:10:07
  - Nah - I reckon we'd get at least 500k. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, May 12, 12:11:36
    - good (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, May 12, 12:12:13

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.