Mark Robins For Me
Of course, any appointment is not without some risk.
Robins would have had Rotherham in the play off's without the points deduction.
He is clearly "working" there and yes, without either belittling Rotherham (who I have always had a soft spot for, as they were Norwich's opponents the very first time I went to Carra') or bigging us up, we would be a step up-even if, without that deduction, they could have been playing us next season (I know, without that deduction and if we go down!)-for him.
He's had bugger all money there and has got them playing good football, winning games and doing well.
He also, though how relevant this is, I don't know-"gets" Norwich- I would hope, though the club to him now will be unrecognisable to the one he knows.
He could work with Butterworth (who I suspect will replace Gunn, come the Summer anyway) and Chippy-and not come too expensive?
Fairly logical all round then, so obviously a non starter.
Posted By: Martin Peters on April 23rd 2009 at 10:19:57
Message Thread
- QUESTION. So what do we do regarding our management team next season? (NCFC) - jimbo, Apr 23, 10:05:35
- the rumour says (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Apr 23, 10:40:34
- why are we writing them off (NCFC) - camcan, Apr 23, 10:38:36
- For me, I'd rather we looked elsewhere. Gunny is a proper legend... (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Apr 23, 10:22:12
- Mark Robins For Me (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Apr 23, 10:19:57
- Has Robins actually done much though? (NCFC) - jimbo, Apr 23, 10:25:02
- More than Gunny (n/m) (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Apr 23, 10:31:32
- Good Point... (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Apr 23, 10:30:39
- I like this, well reasoned. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Apr 23, 10:53:12
- Has Robins actually done much though? (NCFC) - jimbo, Apr 23, 10:25:02
- This is what is doing my head in (NCFC) - Gunn n dusted, Apr 23, 10:11:35
- Steve Tilson would jump at the chance to come here League 1 or Champ. (n/m) (NCFC) - jimbo, Apr 23, 10:15:06
- I'm undecided on this so far. Gunn's got one or two things badly wrong for me so far, but (NCFC) - megson, Apr 23, 10:09:14
- out of interest, which mistakes? (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 23, 10:22:46
- agree with Killen, gambled, failed, move on. No issue with that at all. (NCFC) - megson, Apr 23, 10:54:56
- ok, fair enough (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 23, 11:15:37
- i think excluding matty patty is a bit of a mistake (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 23, 10:24:38
- what if he's gone totally shite (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 23, 10:25:50
- though we don't know why i guess (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 23, 10:25:11
- agree with Killen, gambled, failed, move on. No issue with that at all. (NCFC) - megson, Apr 23, 10:54:56
- But logic tell me... (NCFC) - jimbo, Apr 23, 10:13:43
- I don't believe anything is guaranteed (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 23, 10:24:13
- That is true. But it is about taking the lesser gamble. (n/m) (NCFC) - jimbo, Apr 23, 10:26:07
- It is, but ALL the great managers were inexperienced at some point, you can't rule someone (NCFC) - megson, Apr 23, 10:57:53
- That is true. But it is about taking the lesser gamble. (n/m) (NCFC) - jimbo, Apr 23, 10:26:07
- I don't believe anything is guaranteed (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 23, 10:24:13
- out of interest, which mistakes? (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 23, 10:22:46
- We don't have any money to pay compensation (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 23, 10:08:55
- They all have 6 month contracts only. No compensation required (n/m) (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Apr 23, 10:18:17
- I mean for another manager (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 23, 10:20:39
- Ahh. Sorry. (n/m) (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Apr 23, 10:33:30
- I mean for another manager (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 23, 10:20:39
- A contract given then on the basis of one good result. Utter incompetence. (n/m) (NCFC) - jimbo, Apr 23, 10:16:38
- a promise of a full-time job and a big fat bonus might've helped persuade them (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 23, 10:16:20
- But only if they kept us up i would hope. (n/m) (NCFC) - jimbo, Apr 23, 10:17:32
- ^^^ dependant on them keeping us up... (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 23, 10:16:50
- maybe (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 23, 10:17:42
- OK, not sacking, but not renewing (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 23, 10:21:01
- They should not have to sack him if the deal is only till the end of the season... (NCFC) - jimbo, Apr 23, 10:19:32
- maybe (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 23, 10:17:42
- If that is true then that is madness and we deserve to sink lower. (n/m) (NCFC) - jimbo, Apr 23, 10:14:35
- They all have 6 month contracts only. No compensation required (n/m) (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Apr 23, 10:18:17
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.