be interesting our points to games ratio of how long our board have been here
instead of pinning every single issue we have on the last or current bloke in charge
(not a dig meggers, just another way of thinking about the situation)
Posted By: pants on April 22nd 2009 at 11:35:02
Message Thread
- I honestly believe if we still had Roeder we wouldn't be in this mess and . . . (NCFC) - Yellow Ice, Apr 22, 10:02:32
- 0.96 points per game. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Apr 22, 10:59:49
- be interesting our points to games ratio of how long our board have been here (NCFC) - pants, Apr 22, 11:35:02
- taking into account Worthington's successful years i'd say it's quite a bit more than 0.96 (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 22, 11:41:20
- be interesting our points to games ratio of how long our board have been here (NCFC) - pants, Apr 22, 11:35:02
- lol (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, Apr 22, 10:04:47
- 0.96 points per game. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Apr 22, 10:59:49
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.