translates to

"I stopped doing those replies because we started losing after back to back wins, and then I realised what I was saying was a fat pile of s**t"

pants "correct!"

Posted By: pants on April 21st 2009 at 18:40:46

Message Thread

anyone think plymouth could be the ones who slip up instead of barnsley? (NCFC) - aventura, Apr 21, 18:06:40
- Derby are down (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 18:24:59
  - What happened to all your smug replies about our games not mattering because we're staying (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 18:33:31
    - "please respond Charles, please please I need this, it's like food (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 18:38:49
      - bang (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 21, 18:40:51
      - translates to (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 18:40:46
        
        yes, why would I make the replies you say I did (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 18:45:14
- Blackpool are going down (NCFC) - double hipness, Apr 21, 18:22:59
  - Well, they may well fuck up against Forest, anmd th (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Apr 21, 18:25:27
    - and then Swansea away ? (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Apr 21, 18:25:55
      - exactly (n/m) (NCFC) - double hipness, Apr 21, 18:39:36
- yes possibly but if Barnsley screw up we may not even have to beat Reading! (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 21, 18:12:35
  - yeah i would say we need 4 pts. (NCFC) - aventura, Apr 21, 18:20:37
- i was thinking the same when looking at the tables earlier (NCFC) - city_lad, Apr 21, 18:12:32
- We have to win both games still most probably. (n/m) (NCFC) - jimbo, Apr 21, 18:10:05

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.