i think i agree

(about intra-division loans more that the fish's tit, but not exclusively)

there was a bit on Football365 about Man Ure loaning some of their youngsters to teams that still had to play Liverpool and/or Chelski and how it was unfair that those other teams would effectively have to put out weaker teams against Man Ure than against their title rivals, i seem to recall i agreed with much of it

having said that, i'm glad it's not a rule that's there at the moment, though i never thought i'd be glad to have Shackell back

Posted By: Ralf Scrampton on April 21st 2009 at 17:44:29

Message Thread

Shouldn't we loan Barnsley Cureton, just to make sure they don't score? (n/m) (NCFC) - Chunter, Apr 21, 17:29:00
- No. (n/m) (NCFC) - tim berry, Apr 21, 17:29:41
  - But he's shit and he'd stir up resentment? (n/m) (NCFC) - Chunter, Apr 21, 17:30:25
    - Four points, against burnely and against Preston. (n/m) (NCFC) - tim berry, Apr 21, 17:32:52
    - he scored goals which gave them six (I think) points (NCFC) - camcan, Apr 21, 17:31:53
      - although they are safe now, i wonder if Coleman was getting similar stick for sending (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 21, 17:35:54
        
        post about which I give not the breast of an aquatic creature (NCFC) - camcan, Apr 21, 17:37:38
        
        i think i agree (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 21, 17:44:29
        
        Shouldn't that be the tail-end of an aquatic creature? (NCFC) - Chunter, Apr 21, 17:41:36
        
        fish's tit (NCFC) - camcan, Apr 21, 17:43:15
        
        So which one are you? (NCFC) - Chunter, Apr 21, 17:49:38
      - Yeah, but let's face it, him and Lappin (NCFC) - Chunter, Apr 21, 17:33:50

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.