if all the bigger company is is a holding company for the football club

then this clearly is a loophole. That is, the debts have essentially been incurred by Southampton FC - presumably on unsustainable wages, transfer fees et. Precisely the kind of thing this rule was brought in to stop happening.

Whereas if the debts have been incurred largely on other businesses, then I agree with you - no reason why Soton FC should be penalised, particularly.

Which is the case here?

Posted By: Tricky Hawes on April 1st 2009 at 08:42:50


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in