I think it's a backward step.

Don't you guys want to see the club progress? Yes, Hucks is a legend. Yes, he was great in his time here. Yes, he should have been given a heroes depature - and didn't get it.

But I honestly don't think he's good enough anymore. His final season here was hardly a stellar one was it? And he'll have had a full season of playing in a poor league as well. Why should be pay a decent wage to someone who can only be used as an impact sub?

And for what it's worth, I think Hoolahan gets better with every game. I think he'll be a key player for us next season.

Posted By: LincolnshireCanary on March 30th 2009 at 09:52:21

Message Thread

WOuld it really be popular with the majority of city fans? (NCFC) - megson, Mar 30, 08:48:01
- Me, I love Hucks to bits - but I'd rather he didn't come back (NCFC) - Sugbad The Bad, Mar 30, 12:03:01
- I think it's a backward step. (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Mar 30, 09:52:21
- yes, but i wouldn't agree with them (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Mar 30, 09:40:04
- in short: "yes!" (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Mar 30, 09:26:11
  - Ok, so if we lost, with Hucks on the bench, (NCFC) - megson, Mar 30, 09:54:47
    - all depends innit? (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Mar 30, 10:32:13
      - Yep I agree, pointless question by me. Apols. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Mar 30, 11:07:03
    - actually that's a pointless question cause you can't possibly answer unless it happens (NCFC) - megson, Mar 30, 09:59:21

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.