Old Git, regarding this post

User Posted Link

Not sure what your point is.

I know you know the difference between long term secured, and short term unsecured so what, exactly is the problem?

I know its bigger and that's not good, but the general statement is correct.
No one involved in this debt can say to the club "we want ?X of this paid back by the end of the week or we are calling in the lot"
Which we KNOW is what happened around the end of the Chase era, and is why Ashley Ward turned up at training one morning, was told to clear his locker, and was gone by the end of the day.

That can't happen now, so surely that is essentially a good thing?

I do remain unconvinced that the Jarrold was as required as was made out. There are clubs all over the country with stands as bad as our old south stand that can still use them, I remain to be convinced that we didn't just bow to pressure, rather than use the clubs unique position in the community to put pressure back on the council.
"yes you COULD deny us a safety certificate, but if you do we will make it very clear, via the press, to the 20,000 people that come here every week, why this has happened" I think that would have bought a little 'perspecive' in the inspections, and allowed us a bit more flexibility in the cash low at a crucial time.

Posted By: megson on March 24th 2009 at 14:28:11

Message Thread

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in