I think Lita cannot be loaned back to us this season
From my understanding of the loan rules.
Frankly the cheaper option of relegation isnt really the cheaper option if you figure in the season ticket rebate alone.
All this "the board backed the mangers" is frankly bulls**t.
Does anyone seriously believe that Roeder didnt want to sign Lita on a perm?
Does anyone believe Roeder wanted to sign a lot of players but was told you have to sell to bring anyone in or go in the loan market. (which he did sell more than he brought in)
Even Donk admitted the loans are good because they dont tie the club to long term player deals.
The talk of " we are not even considering going down" is bollocks.
The Croft contract thing is all about our position.
He is going to walk without a doubt.
From the reports of todays game he is already thinking about his next move.
Posted By: UScanary on March 7th 2009 at 19:42:22
Message Thread
- Leroy Lita! (NCFC) - CarlsbergCanary, Mar 7, 18:53:36
- was he available (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 7, 18:59:37
- If he isnt in Reading squad you would presume he must be available....... (NCFC) - CarlsbergCanary, Mar 7, 19:03:47
- I think Lita cannot be loaned back to us this season (NCFC) - UScanary, Mar 7, 19:42:22
- ah, you're guessing, thought so (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 7, 19:12:27
- If he isnt in Reading squad you would presume he must be available....... (NCFC) - CarlsbergCanary, Mar 7, 19:03:47
- was he available (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 7, 18:59:37
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.