I really like the whole Fothers thing, one of the decent things we've done here
amongst the stupidity
Instead of handing out 4 year contracts to players who don't make the first team much, we and the player signed a one year deal, fairly lucrative, but still only a year
It was always going to work out unless said player was outstanding, which he thinks he is
A month or so before the seasons out, he storms off, and we don't have a situation like we could have with say Martin, or Drury being injured, or Matty P not in the first team etc
Gunn has come in and in some sections, has the same dilemmas as Roeder, in that some of the reserve players are here long term, and some on good deals
At least now Fotheringham has thrown a benny, it's easy to finance and get rid
Posted By: pants on March 6th 2009 at 11:34:45
Message Thread
- I really like the whole Fothers thing, one of the decent things we've done here (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 11:34:45
- But if it turned out he was as good as he thought, he could have pissed off (NCFC) - lurd, Mar 6, 11:38:23
- True (NCFC) - pants, Mar 6, 11:43:53
- if he had been as good as he thought (NCFC) - Dave in France, Mar 6, 11:40:14
- and....... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Mar 6, 11:46:55
- Think they did but he would only sign for a year. (NCFC) - lurd, Mar 6, 11:59:15
- and....... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Mar 6, 11:46:55
- But if it turned out he was as good as he thought, he could have pissed off (NCFC) - lurd, Mar 6, 11:38:23
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.