So we shouldn't of signed them?
or we should have signed them on a deal where if any of them leave for any reason even if we make money from said deal we get some of the fee back we paid to the agent?
If sammy goes in the summer we will make back the money we spent on him, hoolahoop and Loopyloop at least, we may even make it back twice over.
I'm not sure that Gilks was worth anything to us, if Blackpool wanted him as a make weight in the deal it was a great f**king deal, we're fine for goalies. And if need be must be we could have got a keeper of gilks' quality from my sunday league on loan.
Posted By: cookpassbabtridge on March 5th 2009 at 12:45:47
Message Thread
- I know every single NCFC fan would like to see this man (NCFC) - cookpassbabtridge, Mar 5, 09:49:40
- here's the stuff he doesn't say (NCFC) - Dave in France, Mar 5, 10:05:26
- ridiculous post (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 5, 13:13:00
- So we shouldn't of signed them? (NCFC) - cookpassbabtridge, Mar 5, 12:45:47
- I wouldn't, I think he's alright. (n/m) (NCFC) - Drurys Left Nut, Mar 5, 10:04:13
- here's the stuff he doesn't say (NCFC) - Dave in France, Mar 5, 10:05:26
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.