In all fairness....
....everyone keeps harping on about how the board need to step down and let new investment into the club.
Like Ipswich, or Leicetser? They are similar sized clubs in terms of support and expectations and where has the money got them? Midtable in the Championship and League 1 resepctively, that's where!
To assume that things would automatically get better with new investment is rather naive, as they say the grass isn't always greener on the other side.
Posted By: greencanary on March 4th 2009 at 16:57:37
Message Thread
- In all fairness.... (NCFC) - greencanary, Mar 4, 16:57:37
- The grass is ALWAYS greener on the other side (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 4, 17:56:10
- What even if you are the GREEN army? (NCFC) - Butterworth, Mar 4, 18:07:32
- Is that semi in a dress? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Mar 4, 19:08:53
- What even if you are the GREEN army? (NCFC) - Butterworth, Mar 4, 18:07:32
- Absolutely (NCFC) - King, Mar 4, 17:34:00
- How many managers have they had in the last 15 years? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Mar 4, 17:41:07
- The main reason for management change (NCFC) - Butterworth, Mar 4, 17:51:20
- Indeed (NCFC) - King, Mar 4, 17:58:39
- because the players can play shite and then are off (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 4, 18:08:59
- When you think of the guy who bought Fotheringham though (NCFC) - pants, Mar 4, 18:26:07
- Well perhaps the lesson to learn is (NCFC) - Butterworth, Mar 4, 18:13:59
- Same with Worthy and Grant (NCFC) - Butterworth, Mar 4, 18:04:32
- You get all this talk about great leaders and stuff (NCFC) - pants, Mar 4, 18:47:11
- I can't be bothered to think (NCFC) - Butterworth, Mar 4, 20:50:50
- You get all this talk about great leaders and stuff (NCFC) - pants, Mar 4, 18:47:11
- because the players can play shite and then are off (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 4, 18:08:59
- Indeed (NCFC) - King, Mar 4, 17:58:39
- Your point being? (n/m) (NCFC) - King, Mar 4, 17:46:12
- They've had 5, and they've done alright most of that time (NCFC) - pants, Mar 4, 17:50:02
- I know, should never have sacked Worthy (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 4, 17:50:58
- should have been more supportive to other managers than just allowing him (NCFC) - pants, Mar 4, 18:03:45
- Load of bollocks (NCFC) - King, Mar 4, 18:26:45
- They didn't support Roeder enought to get Iversen in though did they? (NCFC) - pants, Mar 4, 18:38:46
- so they should have sacked him (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 4, 18:09:25
- Load of bollocks (NCFC) - King, Mar 4, 18:26:45
- should have been more supportive to other managers than just allowing him (NCFC) - pants, Mar 4, 18:03:45
- I know, should never have sacked Worthy (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 4, 17:50:58
- They've had 5, and they've done alright most of that time (NCFC) - pants, Mar 4, 17:50:02
- The main reason for management change (NCFC) - Butterworth, Mar 4, 17:51:20
- How many managers have they had in the last 15 years? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Mar 4, 17:41:07
- Just to hear a positive word from the board would be a start (NCFC) - EtuWHO, Mar 4, 17:26:32
- and be accused of spin (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 4, 17:51:11
- I disagree (NCFC) - EtuWHO, Mar 4, 17:23:05
- The grass is ALWAYS greener on the other side (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 4, 17:56:10
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.