management sign players within.............. ......
the clubs budget contraints.
You dont think GR wouldnt have liked to have signed some better players than he did.
He ended up selling more than he spent overall.
What pressure did the board bring in selling.
Same with Gunn, sold bell, hardly spent anything by all accounts.
Was he told to sell before he brought in anyone.
Remember how we brought in carney long before the board claimed the details of the bell tranfer went down.
At the time we had a ton of wide mid players and no strikers/ central defenders.
Very strange, must have had a crystal ball !
Posted By: UScanary on February 28th 2009 at 19:19:44
Message Thread
- Just got in and haven't posted for a while (NCFC) - Chunter, Feb 28, 18:55:45
- It's not the management in my opinion (NCFC) - APB, Feb 28, 19:06:38
- So the management can take credit for attacking but not defendng (NCFC) - lovely old job, Feb 28, 19:10:25
- management sign players within.................... (NCFC) - UScanary, Feb 28, 19:19:44
- I realise that. (NCFC) - APB, Feb 28, 19:16:13
- Its clear the players are not performing. (NCFC) - gordon ottershaw, Feb 28, 19:23:43
- NAIL HIT ON HEAD ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ (n/m) (NCFC) - South stand corner, Feb 28, 19:26:46
- The trouble is we just have a pile of shit players who the board have allowed (NCFC) - lovely old job, Feb 28, 19:20:38
- Its clear the players are not performing. (NCFC) - gordon ottershaw, Feb 28, 19:23:43
- So the management can take credit for attacking but not defendng (NCFC) - lovely old job, Feb 28, 19:10:25
- It's not the management in my opinion (NCFC) - APB, Feb 28, 19:06:38
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.