my answer to that lies in what I said yesterday. David Bell
450k, signed heavilly injured
sold for 500k, fully fit, and in good nick, and form
Both examples above, can only point to a board failure
If he's worth 500k, then he's not worth 450k injured
If he is worth more than 450k, then why have we sold him for 500k?
If we need the money, then why was he signed for 450k in the first place, only to be sold on after barely 2 months being here in good fitness
This is the same club we love that sold cureton for 200k, and bought back a weaker cureton for 750k
This is the same club that sold darel russell for 125k and bought back the same standard player for 600 odd k
The board are massively involved, and should be held to account
The fact they are removed from it year on year, is why we're in this mess
Posted By: pants on February 18th 2009 at 01:53:47
Message Thread
- King made a good post tonight, responses please (NCFC) - Mr Eko, Feb 18, 00:43:36
- my answer to that lies in what I said yesterday. David Bell (NCFC) - pants, Feb 18, 01:53:47
- Bell wanted to leave. (NCFC) - lurd, Feb 18, 08:18:58
- does that make Clingan solely a board success then? (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 18, 08:08:30
- I think we should all pray for Jesus a little harder (NCFC) - Small, Feb 18, 01:08:57
- missing the point in this post (n/m) (NCFC) - Mr Eko, Feb 18, 11:50:56
- He makes a decent point. (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Feb 18, 00:55:34
- my answer to that lies in what I said yesterday. David Bell (NCFC) - pants, Feb 18, 01:53:47
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.