He was a good player, skilful
But he really did seem like a poor man's Hucks - TOTALLY predictable (the FB just KNEW that he was going to cut back inside to deliver with his right foot) because he lacked Hucks' pace and dribbling-at-speed skill. So he was less dangerous than I thought he was going to be, at first.
I'd rather have him than have 500k, but then I'd rather not have him if we need the 500k so desperately
The basic point remains - we are financially f**ked
Posted By: Old Git on January 30th 2009 at 16:53:07
Message Thread
- Little gutted about Bell, I liked being slightly dangerous at set pieces when he was on (NCFC) - megson, Jan 30, 16:46:37
- He was a good player, skilful (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 30, 16:53:07
- AYe, but then we knew that didn't we? (NCFC) - megson, Jan 30, 17:00:32
- Hopefully lots of clubs will be in the same boat. (NCFC) - APB, Jan 30, 17:03:10
- Fuck off and get your own straw (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 30, 17:14:34
- Hopefully lots of clubs will be in the same boat. (NCFC) - APB, Jan 30, 17:03:10
- AYe, but then we knew that didn't we? (NCFC) - megson, Jan 30, 17:00:32
- nah, he never lived up to the expectation of "lutons best player!" (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Jan 30, 16:47:02
- He was a good player, skilful (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 30, 16:53:07
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.