:) - Wrath of the Barclay

:)

I think we'll win tonight. It's unpopular, but I think we'd have won these two games under Roeder. the Charlton game was a mis match of players on loan not being here and others here not being up to scratch (although I always knew cort would be a waste of time, would love to eat those words as we're desperate for a big player)

I know that might not have been what everyone else wanted but I think we'd have stayed up this season under GR, despite the dislike. The fact he wasn't allowed the chance to win the two games gunny is getting, is also worrying, as it means in future when the going gets tough and we need to hold our nerve, hasty decisions could get made too early

All adds up to why a lot more problems exist here than just getting shot of Roeder assuming everything's ok now

Everyone needs to pull together properly this time and get behind the club no matter what. If like Charles says it's not going to happen because people won't stand for it, then we will go down

Posted By: pants on January 27th 2009 at 17:44:15

Message Thread

What would be a feasible reaction if we lost tonight? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 16:07:44
- Climb the barriers, jog along the touchline (NCFC) - Nelsons final flanel, Jan 27, 16:31:49
- Dick Mennis will get morally indignant? (n/m) (NCFC) - King, Jan 27, 16:25:42
- I answered this last night (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Jan 27, 16:24:01
  - haha, I mean a sensible outcome (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 16:25:34
    - change often does mean results though (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 27, 16:33:08
    - I don't think anything more than a "oh well, it's early days" is appropriate (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Jan 27, 16:32:34
    - and even if we do lose (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 16:29:21
    - erm shouldn't we be waiting til after the result (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 16:28:17
      - I'm not being negative, I'm asking how people will feel in the future (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 16:34:50
        
        well i think it's best to just wait and see (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 16:39:22
        
        I hope this wait and see theory lasts then (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 16:45:35
        
        Roeder's results were unacceptable (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 27, 16:49:01
        
        I haven't mentioned Roeder once in this thread. I'm looking forward (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 16:51:31
        
        looking to the future in a "hope it won't happen like it has the last 2 times" (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 27, 16:54:45
        
        I meant about attitudes really, the blame culture (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 17:00:12
        
        but it has always been that way and always will be that way (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 27, 17:03:12
        
        Including (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 17:01:40
        
        I don't think that is very likely (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 27, 17:05:21
        
        well i don't think it's wise to ask the question (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 17:03:49
        
        So you're saying I'm the only one thinking like this? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 17:07:12
        
        pretty much i think (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 17:09:42
        
        If that was anywhere near the truth, it would be pretty worrying (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 17:11:12
        
        well football fans are well known for being positive (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 17:12:23
        
        need some middle ground though (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 17:14:52
        
        well yeah it's certainly dumb to be like that (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 17:17:08
        
        I thought they did actually (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 17:19:07
        
        well there was post match euphoria (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 17:25:02
        
        Anyway, I'm doing it now, because later, there's less chance of it being a discussion (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 17:09:42
        
        i think most have forgotten about roeder (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 17:11:20
        
        I haven't mention him today (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 17:12:39
        
        yeah you mentioned the stream of glenn roeder baits (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 17:15:27
        
        Well yeah, as they are irrelevant to what I'm asking (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 17:18:07
        
        well i have pretty much forgotten him (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 17:20:00
        
        right now, yes (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 27, 17:08:27
        
        *won (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 17:02:59
        
        well we can only judge and what's happened (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 16:48:30
        
        Del Potro needs to be shot (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 27, 16:40:01
        
        pmsl (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 16:42:16
        
        missed it (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 27, 16:45:38
        
        ... (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 16:47:07
        
        I see nothing funny in this interview (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 27, 16:51:14
        
        lol (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 16:53:45
        
        Not a fan of Cureton then? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 27, 16:38:13
        
        I don't think he was very dignified (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 16:41:52
        
        he did say it was the players fault when roeder went tho (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 16:45:24
      - according to you, we're fucked (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jan 27, 16:29:54
        
        erm not me guv! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 16:31:38
        
        ... (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jan 27, 16:47:45
        
        one of those was a joke (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 16:49:26
        
        byou make a twat of yourself and (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jan 27, 16:55:41
        
        byou what? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 27, 16:58:09
        
        even Brom knows (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jan 27, 17:01:28
        
        aim at me (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 16:52:37
        
        in the same way as lump on is aimed at me (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 16:55:17
        
        lump on, as in you telling the betfair forum to lump on Aidy getting the job? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 17:15:58
        
        duke of york's fault (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 17:27:42
        
        won't ever make that mistake again (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 17:28:29
        
        :) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 17:44:15
        
        well the board have done what they think the fans want (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 18:06:56
        
        mug (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 27, 16:57:29
        
        bartoli!!!!!!!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 16:58:05
        
        oh ffs (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 27, 16:58:37
        
        i'm a legend on there now lol (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 17:00:55
        
        a legendary (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 27, 17:06:45
        
        er no (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 17:10:14
  - I always knew gunn was a bad appointment (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 27, 16:25:06
- Gunn out, sack the board, protest next hum game, boycott season ticket renewal (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 27, 16:14:18
  - not feasible (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 16:15:15
    - Yes it is. Ask Selwyn. And Smudger. If they are actually different people. (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 27, 16:22:18
- thank fuck roeder's gone (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 27, 16:13:20
  - feasible I guess (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 16:15:22
- blub (n/m) (NCFC) - camcan, Jan 27, 16:12:29
  - feasible (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 16:15:29
    - blub is feasible isn't it (NCFC) - camcan, Jan 27, 16:17:37
- Sack the Board (n/m) (NCFC) - EtuWHO, Jan 27, 16:12:17
  - not that feasible at the moment (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 16:15:40
- SUPER GLENN ROEDER!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jan 27, 16:10:03
  - not feasible (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 16:15:49
    - i'll be checking your posts carefully... (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jan 27, 16:16:35
      - Why? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 16:17:00
        
        Feasibility study. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 27, 16:17:59
        
        into Eventguard (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 16:20:10
- Any reaction is feasible. I'd go for a bit of a shrug and then up to The King's for a pint (n/m) (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Jan 27, 16:09:54
  - Whole, semi- or skimmed? (n/m) (NCFC) - King, Jan 27, 16:12:30
    - Haha! - not milk you silly. (n/m) (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Jan 27, 16:12:53
      - How do you know I'm not talking about obscure REAL ales? (NCFC) - King, Jan 27, 16:14:17
        
        Because I have drunk a pint of every single real ale ever in the world for England and, (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Jan 27, 16:15:54
        
        Oh alright (NCFC) - King, Jan 27, 16:18:06
  - "a" (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 27, 16:10:54
    - two? (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Jan 27, 16:12:19
      - school night (NCFC) - camcan, Jan 27, 16:13:35
        
        Yes mutha. (n/m) (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Jan 27, 16:14:56
- I dont know, kill Gunn? (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellow Ice, Jan 27, 16:08:50
  - not feasible (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 16:16:21
- GUNN OUT!!!! (NCFC) - HairyBobbingManAss, Jan 27, 16:08:39
  - not feasible (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 27, 16:16:30

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.