But if they said...

You've got x amount to spend on players with hucks or z amount without hucks and z = 3x what would you do?

Posted By: sheffieldcanary on May 6th 2008 at 11:51:27

Message Thread

Teatment of Hucks an utter, utter disgrace (NCFC) - Jim, May 6, 11:47:45
- Don't think its entirely Roeder, I smell a Doomcaster input here (NCFC) - John in Texas, May 6, 11:50:27
  - If they use it to try and sell tickets for the Greatest Ever I will be fuming (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, May 6, 11:50:59
- I love the fact that this is Roeders doing (NCFC) - pants, May 6, 11:49:08
  - Yes, IT IS HIS CHOICE. HE IS THE MANAGER. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, May 6, 11:53:11
  - Roeder knew his decision well ahead of Sunday (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, May 6, 11:50:37
    - Mind reader, are you? (n/m) (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, May 6, 11:57:19
  - He's the manager, surely all team decisions are ultimately his to make? (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve, May 6, 11:50:08
    - But if they said... (NCFC) - sheffieldcanary, May 6, 11:51:27
      - eggs ackerly...Huckerby as great as he was can't do it now (NCFC) - Maillot Jaune, May 6, 11:56:05
      - x = -b plus or minus the square root of b squared - 4ac (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, May 6, 11:55:12
      - I'd have Hucks (NCFC) - Steve, May 6, 11:54:51
        
        This was going to be my next point. (NCFC) - sheffieldcanary, May 6, 11:59:28
      - Listen I think there is a case either way for the actual decision (NCFC) - Jim, May 6, 11:53:57
      - Tell Hucks and fans before Sunday's debacle (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, May 6, 11:53:39
  - Who else could it be? (NCFC) - Johnny Comecardiff, May 6, 11:50:03
    - .... (NCFC) - pants, May 6, 11:51:06
- Yes, it gets on my teats, too. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, May 6, 11:48:51

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.