Dublin - not a bad signing
We've desperately been crying out for a target man and, with Sutton, injured this is not a bad sigining at all. If we can continue to get the crosses in, Dublin will have enough movement to capitalise and we will no longer by throwing away posession from every set piece due to our lack of height.
The negativity on this board is a disgrace. He's not a great player but we already have the best striker in the league and it is a case of finding someone to play alongside him - Dublin fits this bill very well.
Furthermore, he is not a complete hoof merchant like Thorne or Howard, he has a decent touch and can link play really well. He is extremely similar to Sutton, only less injury prone, and Sutton is a player who most fans would have loved to sign.
Posted By: Komodo on September 20th 2006 at 12:07:59
Message Thread
- Dublin - not a bad signing (NCFC) - Komodo, Sep 20, 12:07:59
- I agree to an extent. (NCFC) - Dog, Sep 20, 12:09:14
- No, a truly awful one (n/m) (NCFC) - Basil Wrathbone, Sep 20, 12:08:58
- he didnt want sutton or Fowler because they were too old! (n/m) (NCFC) - olej24, Sep 20, 12:08:57
- dublin's only 37 (n/m) (NCFC) - olej24, Sep 20, 12:09:09
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.