Rather than everyone characterising what others think, in order to then attack it
(bit of a roth trait...) - would be interested to see what rothers *actually* think we should do now.
So let's see what you actually all think. Post an answer, (a), (b), or (c), to this post, where:
(a) Board should sack Hoots now
(b) Board should stick with him for now, but if we don't get results against West Ham and Palace at home, we will probably have to make a change
(c) This is all premature and he deserves more time than this
(d) Something else (in which case, say what that means)
Ta. Will post mine above...
Posted By: Tricky Hawes on October 28th 2013 at 13:59:11
Message Thread
- Rather than everyone characterising what others think, in order to then attack it (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Oct 28, 13:59:11
- C for Charlie (n/m) (NCFC) - Chris Peacock, Oct 28, 20:46:47
- B (n/m) (NCFC) - avid_canary, Oct 28, 20:05:32
- C (n/m) (NCFC) - Holy lambchop of god, Oct 28, 19:56:32
- (C) (n/m) (NCFC) - Waddockhunt, Oct 28, 19:21:39
- C (n/m) (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Oct 28, 19:21:06
- B. (n/m) (NCFC) - um_gah, Oct 28, 18:59:25
- Firm C. (n/m) (NCFC) - Pit, Oct 28, 18:35:08
- c) (n/m) (NCFC) - Basil Wrathbone, Oct 28, 18:35:02
- c (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Oct 28, 18:26:35
- c (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Oct 28, 18:19:29
- c (n/m) (NCFC) - OiFulcher93, Oct 28, 16:14:51
- c (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Oct 28, 15:38:44
- c (n/m) (NCFC) - trustsec, Oct 28, 15:06:24
- C-ish. (NCFC) - norway, Oct 28, 15:01:18
- (B) (NCFC) - Basingstoke_Canary, Oct 28, 14:56:06
- (b) (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Oct 28, 14:56:04
- Nearer C than B (n/m) (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Oct 28, 14:36:29
- C, leaning towards B depending on the extent to which we're 'cut adrift' (n/m) (NCFC) - Wild Edric, Oct 28, 14:36:07
- d) should've been sacked last season (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 28, 14:34:23
- c (n/m) (NCFC) - Mozzer, Oct 28, 14:32:01
- C. Even if relegation form after Xmas I'd stick with him and re-evaluate in the summer. (n/m) (NCFC) - Hongky, Oct 28, 14:30:33
- (b) and three quarters. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Oct 28, 14:25:34
- C (n/m) (NCFC) - meeky, Oct 28, 14:19:45
- C please Bob (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Oct 28, 14:19:18
- I'm for c (NCFC) - Johnny Comecardiff, Oct 28, 14:17:36
- d (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Oct 28, 14:12:04
- I think the assumption is we lose those away games (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 28, 14:14:30
- even winning them shouldn't make Hoots automatically unsackable (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Oct 28, 14:25:45
- haha (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 28, 14:31:50
- even winning them shouldn't make Hoots automatically unsackable (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Oct 28, 14:25:45
- I think the assumption is we lose those away games (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 28, 14:14:30
- C (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Oct 28, 14:11:38
- b (NCFC) - Vivid Data Shark, Oct 28, 14:10:44
- d) We're only ever going to finish about 7th tops (NCFC) - pants, Oct 28, 14:09:58
- It's not because we haven't won on a weekly basis for most (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 28, 14:17:56
- Reasoned and sensible....you ok pants?!! (n/m) (NCFC) - admckechnie, Oct 28, 14:10:57
- I've always been ok with us being stable, it's all I've ever wanted (NCFC) - pants, Oct 28, 14:16:02
- I want us to be stable, my concern is that we could face relegation (NCFC) - earlydoors, Oct 28, 14:27:03
- I care about decent pros in the game getting the chop. Like Mills at York being replaced (NCFC) - pants, Oct 28, 14:49:36
- Why do you take it personally? (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 28, 14:52:03
- I care about decent pros in the game getting the chop. Like Mills at York being replaced (NCFC) - pants, Oct 28, 14:49:36
- I like it (n/m) (NCFC) - admckechnie, Oct 28, 14:19:55
- I want us to be stable, my concern is that we could face relegation (NCFC) - earlydoors, Oct 28, 14:27:03
- I've always been ok with us being stable, it's all I've ever wanted (NCFC) - pants, Oct 28, 14:16:02
- C. obviously. (n/m) (NCFC) - asics_kit, Oct 28, 14:09:48
- closer to c than b (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Oct 28, 14:09:37
- Probably (b) (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 28, 14:06:38
- b (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Oct 28, 14:06:31
- C (n/m) (NCFC) - admckechnie, Oct 28, 14:06:29
- c (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Oct 28, 14:06:05
- c (n/m) (NCFC) - grumpy, Oct 28, 14:04:59
- c (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 28, 14:04:46
- Leaning towards C from B. (n/m) (NCFC) - Buford T Justice, Oct 28, 14:04:39
- C (NCFC) - Surrey Yella, Oct 28, 14:02:15
- between b) and c) 6 or 7 games more (n/m) (NCFC) - Maillot Jaune, Oct 28, 14:01:27
- somewhere between b and c (n/m) (NCFC) - matt in london, Oct 28, 14:03:32
- (b) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Oct 28, 14:00:13
- agreed (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 28, 14:03:25
- Give him a ring and point out his mistakes to him. I'm sure he'll (NCFC) - CB41, Oct 28, 14:07:19
- the same mistakes the other non deluded have pointed out (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 28, 14:08:59
- Blimey, a bevvey of sages. Maybe we should get shot of the position of manager altogether (NCFC) - CB41, Oct 28, 14:10:36
- VMT (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 28, 14:15:16
- Hmmm a collective noun for THAT wrath group of sages?? Let (NCFC) - admckechnie, Oct 28, 14:12:46
- a murray (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 28, 14:15:45
- I was think more genitalia related..... (n/m) (NCFC) - admckechnie, Oct 28, 14:16:58
- a murray (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 28, 14:15:45
- Blimey, a bevvey of sages. Maybe we should get shot of the position of manager altogether (NCFC) - CB41, Oct 28, 14:10:36
- Haha!! (n/m) (NCFC) - admckechnie, Oct 28, 14:08:14
- the same mistakes the other non deluded have pointed out (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 28, 14:08:59
- Give him a ring and point out his mistakes to him. I'm sure he'll (NCFC) - CB41, Oct 28, 14:07:19
- agreed (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 28, 14:03:25
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.