I see what you're saying
(I think the coast is clear)
and I agree, I've just seen this before with us, and feel natural skepticism
Not just because we've got a player we've wanted for 4 years.
But because when it comes to getting a target in, in future, which we need to bid money for, which in most cases is a striker.
This is the ball park we're in. Our board aren't going to stump up around 700k for Iversen Helguson etc. Lambert like Roeder is going to have to dangle Wes into it and hope the other club wants him
If not, another club will wait for us to struggle because we don't accommodate a manager properly to his targets, and then purchase the player they wanted when another manager comes in and needs some funds for loans or his own ideas
You're hearing the board and past regimes with this signing already in my opinion
In order to satisfy Ward's decent west ham wage, to coventry wages, to us. Lambert has got rid of Doherty. It's a good move, but you can see that in order for Lambert to move and deal here....he has to sacrifice someone else, instead of an addition
This has gone on since Grant was made manager, as Worthington was allowed the lavish spending
Roeder had to sell Brown and Joe Lewis, in order to get Matty P and his loans. A season on, he had to sell Shackell to do the same. When it came to tracking his main target for the season Iversen, we started stalling around on fees, and the fact Rosenberg were in Europe.
We couldn't bid them until they cracked and sold. Just like we couldn't bid and get Matty Taylor
A lot of the negative gene at Norwich isn't to do with the management team, it's further up than that
Yes, I quite like the Ward signing, but I can see how it came about us getting him. It's the same failed reasoning behind how Cureton came back here, because he was put back here and was supposed to do what Earnshaw did, just like Brellier was suppose to do what Etuhu did
Just like selling Bell and getting 5-6 loans in was supposed to keep us up
Maybe I'm reading way too much into it. But it is a player we've never managed to sign when the money requested has been stated
Posted By: pants on May 26th 2010 at 15:58:55
Message Thread
- If everything changed when McNasty arrived, why have we just signed someone we've been (NCFC) - pants, May 26, 14:52:43
- clubs a joke (n/m) (NCFC) - Lambert Nobacon, May 26, 15:08:17
- I've only just figured out where your name is from. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, May 26, 15:29:10
- I still haven't (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 26, 15:30:09
- chumbawambababababa (NCFC) - pants, May 26, 15:33:01
- Danbert Nobacon was the member of Chumbawumba who tipped water over Two Jags Prescott (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, May 26, 15:32:07
- Oh. I thought it was as in "We have Lamb, but no bacon." (NCFC) - jafski, May 26, 15:35:52
- Correct (NCFC) - Lambert Nobacon, May 26, 15:43:01
- Aksherly, i reckon you is right innit. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, May 26, 15:38:09
- ah (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 26, 15:33:18
- One good song (NCFC) - Old Git, May 26, 15:35:22
- I liked a couple of the album tracks I heard. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, May 26, 15:35:17
- Amnesia was ok, largely a one year fad (NCFC) - pants, May 26, 15:39:00
- Oh. I thought it was as in "We have Lamb, but no bacon." (NCFC) - jafski, May 26, 15:35:52
- I still haven't (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 26, 15:30:09
- It is while we're in this divisi- (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 26, 15:09:45
- haha (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, May 26, 15:25:08
- What about Tommy Vance? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 26, 15:27:18
- v v v v v v (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 26, 15:31:40
- Come again? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, May 26, 15:32:41
- That's what your Dad said (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 26, 15:33:39
- Come again? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, May 26, 15:32:41
- v v v v v v (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 26, 15:31:40
- What about Tommy Vance? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 26, 15:27:18
- haha (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, May 26, 15:25:08
- I've only just figured out where your name is from. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, May 26, 15:29:10
- who cares that Lambert wanted a player that a previous manager also wanted? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 26, 15:05:33
- You wrote erlevance. (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, May 26, 15:24:42
- I did. I meant relevance. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 26, 15:25:08
- I quite liked erlevance. (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, May 26, 15:28:56
- I thought it was a bit diastrous. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 26, 15:29:28
- Good cross-erference. (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, May 26, 15:39:27
- I thought it was a bit diastrous. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 26, 15:29:28
- I quite liked erlevance. (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, May 26, 15:28:56
- I did. I meant relevance. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, May 26, 15:25:08
- You wrote erlevance. (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, May 26, 15:24:42
- has it never occured to you that more than 1 manager might rate a player? (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, May 26, 15:03:14
- and lambert still picked players who played under roeder (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 26, 15:04:59
- It has occured to me that we've only landed him now cos he's free (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 26, 15:04:09
- so what you twat (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, May 26, 15:07:53
- we should be looking to sign any decent players who are out of contract (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 26, 15:07:08
- go away (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 26, 15:07:46
- i'm allowed to post here (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 26, 15:08:28
- You accused me of stalking you (NCFC) - pants, May 26, 15:10:39
- you're making shocking points about my football club (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 26, 15:12:23
- and if you had stuck to your promise of not talking about football matters (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 26, 15:14:46
- go away (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 26, 15:14:04
- you're making shocking points about my football club (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 26, 15:12:23
- You accused me of stalking you (NCFC) - pants, May 26, 15:10:39
- i'm allowed to post here (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 26, 15:08:28
- go away (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 26, 15:07:46
- well Pants it's obvious if there are good freebies going we are going to snap them up (NCFC) - lovely old job, May 26, 15:05:56
- I like him, I just think it's a shame we get him (NCFC) - pants, May 26, 15:09:05
- Huh? (NCFC) - 1morepost4jame_sward, May 26, 15:16:02
- so it's bad that we're not spunking cash (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 26, 15:11:31
- I just don't get it. I would rather sign someone for free than pay money for him (NCFC) - lovely old job, May 26, 15:10:56
- I see what you're saying (NCFC) - pants, May 26, 15:58:55
- I'll maybe go into this sensibly another time (NCFC) - pants, May 26, 15:17:27
- but this time he's not just joining cos his club wants the cash (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 26, 15:13:21
- I like him, I just think it's a shame we get him (NCFC) - pants, May 26, 15:09:05
- I think the big difference is that he actually signed for us this time, before (NCFC) - lovely old job, May 26, 14:59:25
- No, he did sign for us before but they were so incompetent they put him in a cupboard and (NCFC) - jafski, May 26, 15:01:02
- exactly (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 26, 15:00:17
- i was waiting for your doom and gloom reaction (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 26, 14:56:06
- clubs a joke (n/m) (NCFC) - Lambert Nobacon, May 26, 15:08:17
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.